Eugen Leitl wrote:
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Would it help if I do a ./configure --with-user=root ?
Don't Do That. Amanda won't (and shouldn't) run that way. But you do
I know. I was just getting desperate, and started tweaking random things.
need to do 'make install' as root, as
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Andrea Dell'Amico wrote:
Don't do that, neither. Assign the group backup to the amanda user,
chown root /usr/local/sbin/amcheck, and then rerun it as amanda.
I've done what Gene Heskett said:
# cat /etc/group
...
backup::303:amanda
...
# cat /etc/passwd
...
Georg Rehfeld wrote:
Hi Kurt, John and all others,
Kurt Yoder wrote:
John Dalbec said:
So the dumper immediately reports 'connection refused' when
attempting
to connect to the taper process. Wrong permissions?
Wrong permissions on what? It's a TCP connection over the loopback.
What
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:31:18PM -0500, John Dalbec wrote:
It just occurred to me that maybe this is a side effect of /etc/hosts cache
poisoning (courtesy of Red Hat Linux 7.3 NSCD). We've been getting e-mail
from a netblock in Vietnam that reverse-resolves
Georg Rehfeld wrote:
John Dalbec wrote:
Georg Rehfeld wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mail03 /var/spool/mail lev 0 FAILED [dump to tape failed]
mail03 /home lev 0 FAILED [dump to tape failed]
Did you try amstatus? It should give the reason. Also look
OK, that was the magic incantation. But what would cause a connection failure
over the loopback interface? My firewall trusts it and I don't see any dropped
packets.
Using /var/lib/amanda/WeeklySet1/amdump.1 from Mon Dec 29 00:45:01 EST 2003
mail01:/ 0
I can't find anything in /tmp/amanda or /var/log/messages. Am I just not
looking in the right places?
Thanks,
John
These dumps were to tape WeeklySet116.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: WeeklySet117.
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mail03 /var/spool/mail lev 0 FAILED [dump to
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:04:29AM -0500, John Dalbec wrote:
I can't find anything in /tmp/amanda or /var/log/messages. Am I just not
looking in the right places?
Thanks,
John
You are not using any holding disk, is that intentional?
I have two holding disks specified
Todd Kover wrote:
I went to the amanda-patches page to download patches for 2.4.2p2 but
the links are broken. Where can I get the patches? I'm running Red Hat
7.3 so I think I need to keep using 2.4.2p2.
This has been repaired and the patches accessible again (assuming you
haven't
I went to the amanda-patches page to download patches for 2.4.2p2 but
the links are broken. Where can I get the patches? I'm running Red Hat
7.3 so I think I need to keep using 2.4.2p2.
Thanks,
John Dalbec
) to secure ports. You might consult Linksys to determine
whether this is possible.
John Dalbec
I rebuilt amanda with the following:
--with-tcpports=1500,2000
--with-udpports=800,900
with no luck.
Could someone please advise.
Tks,
Steve Bertrand
John Dalbec wrote:
I'm using Red Hat 7.1, kernel 2.4.9-34 w/ReiserFS quota patches.
I've since rebuilt the kernel after doubling the UDP timeouts in
ip_conntrack_proto_udp.c. So far this seems to be working...
Thanks,
John Dalbec
Hadad wrote:
Hi !
I get a wrong version before
Well, now I get the right version, and the errors change:
[root@localhost amanda-2.4.3b4]# ./configure --disable-libtool --without-client
--with-user=amanda and --with-group=amanda
Take out the word and here and you should be OK.
Sorry, I forgot to put a hard line break. Trying again...
Hadad wrote:
Hi !
I get a wrong version before
Well, now I get the right version, and the errors change:
[root@localhost amanda-2.4.3b4]# ./configure --disable-libtool
--without-client --with-user=amanda and
Galen Johnson wrote:
John Dalbec wrote:
I sometimes get sendsize packets being dropped by iptables, presumably
because the iptables connection tracking decided the UDP connection
was closed. This causes the estimates to take much longer because the
first sendsize process gives up
I sometimes get sendsize packets being dropped by iptables, presumably
because the iptables connection tracking decided the UDP connection was
closed. This causes the estimates to take much longer because the first
sendsize process gives up. Has anyone found a solution to this?
Thanks,
John
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/16.html
janebackup wrote:
Hi,
I'm using amanda 2.4.3b3 on my Linux machine, I am just trying to backup one
directory on
this one machine and I'm having probems. When I run amcheck I get:
WARNING: dataserv: selfcheck request timeout. Host
-devel (only needed
for development work). They should all be on your distribution CDs.
John Dalbec
OT: How are the IOCCC results coming along?
best luck doing the compile. Just an FYI
Doug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:05:22PM +0930, Adam Smith wrote:
I've been looking around at tape drives and backup software, and I had
Amanda recommended to me. Upon looking at amanda.org, I didn't see any
kind of Hardware Compatibility list. Is this more dependant
Double check that you don't have a file size limit for anybody in
/etc/security/limits.conf. Note that if your personal account has a file size
limit and you su and su amanda -c ... the file size limit is carried forward
through the sus.
If this is reproducible, you could try running an
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We are just about to start on the upgrade of our Linux file server. When
we are done, it will have:
- -Approx 100GB SCSI RAID (approx 40% capacity utilised)
- -Approx 45GB IDE RAID (approx 60% utilised)
- -Approx
Brian M. Weir wrote:
Are there any patches I might be missing or is this fixed in a BETA version
of Amanda?
The segfault issue is fixed in the HEAD branch of CVS. I'm not sure
exactly when it was patched. However, you need to figure out where the
invalid information is coming from that
Davidson, Brian wrote:
I'm trying to build amanda on an NCR 3430 running MP-RAS.
While compiling I got the following error:
In file included from alloc.c:33:
amanda.h:1092: conflicting types for `strncasecmp'
/usr/include/strings.h:32: previous declaration of `strncasecmp'
This is fixed in CVS. The following patch fixed the problem for me,
but YMMV. In particular, if your firewall is picky about source ports
for outgoing connections, it won't help you. Note that this is *not*
the patch in CVS; OTOH it only affects one file rather than two. It
also brings the
Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
solution to this? I sure hope 'amrecover' doesn't require me to load the
tape manually.
It does. You have to insert the tape as directed.
I can see why amrecover does this when no changer is defined. But why can't it issue
'amtape ... slot ##' commands
Fix the setuid-root errors first, then run amcheck again. You may find that
your permissions problems are gone.
John
Kyle S. Allender wrote:
I'm having a problem with the following:
RedHat 7.1, Amanda 2.4.2p2.
Tape drive is an Ecrix device.
Amanda user = amanda
Amanda group =
configure.in says:
AC_ARG_WITH(portrange,
[ --with-portrange=low,high bind unreserved TCP server sockets to ports
within this range [unlimited]],
[
TCPPORTRANGE=$withval
]
)
but --with-portrange also binds TCP client sockets (not just server sockets) to
ports
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 at 10:10am, Stephen Carville wrote
I have an exclude list that looks like:
/proc
/devices
/tmp
/temp
/var/lock
/var/spool/postfix/private
/spool/postfix/private
/var/tmp
/lost+found
*..LCK
But amrecover tells me that
Double check that you don't have a file size limit for anybody in
/etc/security/limits.conf. Note that if your personal account has a file size
limit and you su and su amanda -c ... the file size limit is carried forward
through the sus.
If this is reproducible, you could try running an
I'm using the tapedev 0 configuration style for chg-scsi as suggested in
TAPE.CHANGERS. This confuses amrecover, which expects to see 0 as a valid
tape device rather than looking for the changer config file to determine the
correct tape device. Yes, I can use the settape(sp?) command, but it's
Does amanda take it upon herself to clean the tape drive after a certain amount
of use? If so, how is this controlled? The manual for our tape drive says to
clean it only when the front panel display requests it.
Thanks,
John
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Carlos Eduardo Gomes Marins wrote:
Hi,
I want to know if thereis any way to change the name of a dc entry.
The structure of my Ldap Server is similar to this:
dn: dc=arbi, dc=rsfn, dc=net, dc=br
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
This looks like a
32 matches
Mail list logo
