RE: Estimate timeout

2005-08-31 Thread LaValley, Brian E
, 2005 11:21 AM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: Re: Estimate timeout On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 at 11:01am, LaValley, Brian E wrote sendsize: debug 1 pid 12359 ruid 548 euid 548: start at Mon Aug 29 18:00:02 2005 sendsize: version 2.4.4p2 sendsize[12359]: time 0.034: waiting

Estimate timeout

2005-08-30 Thread LaValley, Brian E
Can someone please help me get to the bottom of this issue? I have Amanda 2.4.4p2 on a Fedora Core 3 machine which is the tape server. It has no trouble backing up itself and other Linux machines. The trouble comes with a Sun Solaris 8 client which never completes its estimate. I tried to keep

RE: Estimate timeout

2005-08-30 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I'll have to get back to you on running the command by itself. My tar version is: tar (GNU tar) 1.13 -Original Message- From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:21 AM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: Re: Estimate timeout

RE: Estimate timeout

2005-08-30 Thread LaValley, Brian E
Ok, I'll try a new version of tar after my test of the tar command on its own. -Original Message- From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:33 AM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: RE: Estimate timeout On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 at 11

RE: Holding disk size misread by amcheck

2005-08-24 Thread LaValley, Brian E
, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: Re: Holding disk size misread by amcheck Paul Bijnens wrote: LaValley, Brian E wrote: I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds much less space available

Holding disk size misread by amcheck

2005-08-23 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I have a Fedora Core 3 amanda server. I have specified an nfs mounted directory for one of the holding disks. Does anyone know why amcheck finds much less space available on this drive than a command like 'df' does?

Estimate timeout issue

2005-08-16 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I have an AMANDA client machine with Solaris 8 and logical volumes on a disk. The AMANDA server's config has etimeout=29600 so it waits 59202 seconds and fails. planner: time 59202.106: error result for host coneng disk /dev/vx/dsk/opt: Estimate timeout from coneng planner: time 59202.108: error

Tape drive device files

2005-08-09 Thread LaValley, Brian E
Can someone point me to a good educational site for /dev information? I have attached a tape drive to my machine, but I can't find the special files. I know it should be nst* but they don't exist. Do they have to be created manually?

data timeout error

2005-08-04 Thread LaValley, Brian E
My backup is failing. It worked a couple days ago. It reports a data timeout. I have pasted the sendbackup debug file at the end. It warns of the index tee cannot write [Broken pipe] What should I be looking into for this problem? Thank you. Forwarded Message From: Quick

RE: data timeout error

2005-08-04 Thread LaValley, Brian E
-0400, LaValley, Brian E enlightened us: My backup is failing. It worked a couple days ago. It reports a data timeout. I have pasted the sendbackup debug file at the end. It warns of the index tee cannot write [Broken pipe] What should I be looking into for this problem? Thank you

sendsize.c

2005-08-01 Thread LaValley, Brian E
How do you implement this modified sendsize.c I am hearing so much about. I tried compiling and simply replacing the old one. Now I get a format error. amandad: debug 1 pid 31771 ruid 548 euid 548: start at Mon Aug 1 14:37:11 2005 amandad: version 2.4.4p2 amandad: build: VERSION=Amanda-2.4.4p2

Estimate timeout

2005-07-23 Thread LaValley, Brian E
My dumps aren't completing. One fishy thing I am seeing in the logs is two of the same partition, /home 1 and /home 0 What does this mean? Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 000-B0F0E609 SEQ 1122119536 SECURITY USER backup SERVICE sendsize OPTIONS features=feff9ffe0f;maxdumps=1;hostname=blavalley-l;

AMRECOVER testing

2005-07-21 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I am setting up a new AMANDA install. I have had seemingly successful backups, but when I try to restore files I get the following. amrecover add cpit Added /lavalley/bin/cpit amrecover extract Extracting files using tape drive 0 on host blavalley-l. The following tapes are needed: DailySet1-A04

RE: AMRECOVER testing

2005-07-21 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I thought it would be there too, but that directory is empty. -Original Message- From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:59 AM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: Re: AMRECOVER testing On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 at 8:29am, LaValley

RE: AMRECOVER testing

2005-07-21 Thread LaValley, Brian E
any more? How do you do that? Or does everyone just not worry about it? -Original Message- From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:57 AM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: RE: AMRECOVER testing On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 at 9:49am

amrecover output

2005-07-21 Thread LaValley, Brian E
Do you usually get lots of tar output when running amrecover's extract? tar: ./forrest/nsmail/people.sbd/.Bob.summary: invalid sparse archive member tar: Skipping to next header tar: ./forrest/nsmail/people.sbd/.MIKE.summary: invalid sparse archive member tar: Skipping to next header tar:

RE: amrecover output

2005-07-21 Thread LaValley, Brian E
: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:24 AM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: Amanda (E-mail) Subject: Re: amrecover output LaValley, Brian E wrote: Do you usually get lots of tar output when running amrecover's extract? tar: ./forrest/nsmail/people.sbd/.Bob.summary: invalid sparse archive member tar: Skipping

RE: all estimate failed

2005-07-19 Thread LaValley, Brian E
by Amanda 2.4.4p3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [28] -Original Message- From: Brian Cuttler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:45 PM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: 'amanda-users@amanda.org' Subject: Re: all estimate failed Brian, On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:44:00PM -0400, LaValley, Brian

RE: all estimate failed

2005-07-19 Thread LaValley, Brian E
is low or the client is slow for any reasons... On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:57:57AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: On Tuesday 19 July 2005 07:49, LaValley, Brian E wrote: I do have some things in different places. What files should be in /tmp/amanda? I already had a username of amanda

RE: all estimate failed

2005-07-19 Thread LaValley, Brian E
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon LaBadie Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:31 AM To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Re: all estimate failed On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:04:57AM -0400, LaValley, Brian E wrote: I am all set now. Thanks for all

RE: all estimate failed

2005-07-18 Thread LaValley, Brian E
- From: Brian Cuttler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:31 PM To: LaValley, Brian E Cc: 'amanda-users@amanda.org' Subject: Re: all estimate failed Brian, You said manual dump, the amcheck succeeded ? Did you find any files in the client's /tmp/amanda/ directory ? Do

all estimate failed

2005-07-18 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I have just decided to give AMANDA a try and am learning as I go. I have gotten as far as trying a manual amdump, but it seems the estimate is failing and nothing gets backed up. What could this be? The email report follows, and the amdump log is attached.

disk offline?

2003-08-14 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I have not been able to backup anything on my local system. AMANDA reports that it thinks the disk is offline. Where should I start looking to find out what is wrong?

NFS mounts

2003-08-14 Thread LaValley, Brian E
Can I list an nfs mounted disk in the disklist file? I only ask because I am having trouble compiling for Solaris 8.

HPUX 11.0 compile problems

2003-08-06 Thread LaValley, Brian E
I have run the configure script and get the following warnings. Are these warning important? configure: WARNING: netinet/ip.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: netinet/ip.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: netinet/ip.h: proceeding with the

HPUX 11.0 Install

2003-07-24 Thread LaValley, Brian E
Hello. When I run the configure script I get the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./configure checking build system type... hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 checking host system type... hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 checking target system type... hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 checking for a BSD-compatible install...