* Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:45:03PM
-0500)
> It will require to much work to the sendbackup process. It
> will be possible to do it with the DUMPER-API, is you have time, you
> should work on the DUMPER-API.
Time,
yeah, heard about that ..
seems to be ver
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> * Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:59:16PM -0200)
> > On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being ba
* Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:59:16PM -0200)
> On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being backed
>> up ?
> The problem is that you wouldn't be able to tell error messages
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being backed
> up ?
The problem is that you wouldn't be able to tell error messages from
the actual file list. So we do throw a `tar tf' in the pipeline.
--
Alexand
sidenote:
since egroups went yahoo, I haven';t eben able to access the searchable
archives ..
Is this just Konqueror, or is it broken ?
Anyway,
When dumping with ufsdump, amanda pipes through ufsrestore to get an index
.. fair enough
However, when dumping via tar, we dont need this, right ?
do
