Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-03 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
* Jean-Francois Malouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20051102 07:58]: > * Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20051101 19:56]: > > Hi Jean-Francois, > > > > Thanks for the good report. > > > > The problem is the result of the dumper, which is FAILED, in that > > case the dump is not retried. > > >

Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 11:37, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: >Hi, > >[ BTW, I noticed a thread addressing this question yesterday or so > but I don't want to hijack it... ] > >I just upgraded to 2.4.5 and noticed that if a DLE is sent directly to >tape it is not retried if it hits EOT (a full d

Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-02 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
* Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20051101 19:56]: > Hi Jean-Francois, > > Thanks for the good report. > > The problem is the result of the dumper, which is FAILED, in that > case the dump is not retried. > > Could you try this patch. I just applied the patch and will let know how it

Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-01 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Hi Jean-Francois, Thanks for the good report. The problem is the result of the dumper, which is FAILED, in that case the dump is not retried. Could you try this patch. On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:37:02AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: > dumper: driver: result time 23806.848 from dumper0: F

Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-01 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:30:33PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: > > Is it reasonable to restart the entire dump of the DLE? > > Are there any other "dump" failures that are retried? > > To the first question: yes, as long as the dump takes lees than > dtimeout as I'm saying below. > My u

Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-01 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
* Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20051101 16:02]: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Scott R. Burns wrote: > > I observed this same issue with: > > > > 2.4.4p4 > > NetBSD/i386 > > HP DAT24*6 > > > > My last DLE was > than the remaining tape, but would fit entirely on the > > next empty

Re: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-01 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Scott R. Burns wrote: > I observed this same issue with: > > 2.4.4p4 > NetBSD/i386 > HP DAT24*6 > > My last DLE was > than the remaining tape, but would fit entirely on the > next empty tape in the changer as it was the only remaining DLE. It was > report

RE: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-01 Thread Scott R. Burns
, 2005 11:37 AM To: AMANDA users Subject: 2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry? Hi, [ BTW, I noticed a thread addressing this question yesterday or so but I don't want to hijack it... ] I just upgraded to 2.4.5 and noticed that if a DLE is sent directly to tape it is not retr

2.4.5: dumping directly to tape failure: no retry?

2005-11-01 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
Hi, [ BTW, I noticed a thread addressing this question yesterday or so but I don't want to hijack it... ] I just upgraded to 2.4.5 and noticed that if a DLE is sent directly to tape it is not retried if it hits EOT (a full dump that won't fit in the holdding space). I have runtapes = 10 and ne