Re: A question about tapecycles and 0 dumps

2001-01-22 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, Gerhard den Hollander schrieb: It looks like amanda tries to squeeze exactly 1 0 dump for each filesystem in a dumpcycle. This is bad (just imagine a diskcrash just as the disk is being 0dumped to the tape that had the last 0dump on it). No, that is the intended way amanda works.

Re: A question about tapecycles and 0 dumps

2001-01-22 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Christoph Scheeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 10:31:14AM +0100) It looks like amanda tries to squeeze exactly 1 0 dump for each filesystem in a dumpcycle. This is bad (just imagine a diskcrash just as the disk is being 0dumped to the tape that had the last 0dump on it).

Re: A question about tapecycles and 0 dumps

2001-01-22 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jan 22, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like amanda tries to squeeze exactly 1 0 dump for each filesystem in a dumpcycle. Yep. dumpcycle specifies how often you want full backups. tapecycle specifies how many tapes you have. If you want more than one full