I recently changed my config from
dumpcycle 4 weeks
runspercycle 20
tapecycle 25 tapes
to
dumpcycle 2 weeks
runspercycle 12
tapecycle 50 tapes
backups are working fine, but I'm confused by the following output
which is just an example of one device:
$ amadmin DailySet1 find
Small disk are often promoted to try to get a balanced schedule.
If it is a problem, you can set the 'maxpromoteday' for this disk.
Jean-Louis
Brandon Metcalf wrote:
I recently changed my config from
dumpcycle 4 weeks
runspercycle 20
tapecycle 25 tapes
to
dumpcycle 2 weeks
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:
m Small disk are often promoted to try to get a balanced schedule.
m If it is a problem, you can set the 'maxpromoteday' for this disk.
Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. I guess
the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Brandon Metcalf
bran...@geronimoalloys.com wrote:
Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. I guess
the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running out of space
on which I stored the backups?
This is one of many reasons that
d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:
d On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Brandon Metcalf
d bran...@geronimoalloys.com wrote:
d Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. ??I guess
d the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running out of space
d on which I stored the
b == bran...@cedar.geronimoalloys.com writes:
b d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:
b d On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Brandon Metcalf
b d bran...@geronimoalloys.com wrote:
b d Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. ??I guess
b d the only reason it would be a problem
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Brandon Metcalf
bran...@geronimoalloys.com wrote:
Do I need to relabel the tapes I deleted and then added back?
You should use 'amrmtape' to remove the tapes you deleted with 'rm'
Modern versions of Amanda have an --erase option to amrmtape that can
do the
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:32:16AM -0500, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
I recently changed my config from
dumpcycle 4 weeks
runspercycle 20
tapecycle 25 tapes
to
dumpcycle 2 weeks
runspercycle 12
tapecycle 50 tapes
backups are working fine, but I'm confused by the following
On Thursday 14 May 2009 7:06:57 am Brandon Metcalf wrote:
m == martin...@zmanda.com writes:
m Small disk are often promoted to try to get a balanced schedule.
m If it is a problem, you can set the 'maxpromoteday' for this disk.
Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. I
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Brandon Metcalf
bran...@geronimoalloys.com wrote:
Yep, this makes sense based on the notes from the planner. I guess
the only reason it would be a problem is if I'm running out of space
on which I stored the
Jeffrey D Anderson wrote:
Perhaps the solution is not in changing the planner behavior, but in taper
options. It would be acceptible to me if amanda wrote most of the holding
disk files to tape, but elected to save some for the next night if it meant
better allocation of media.
Look at
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
I recently changed my config from
dumpcycle 4 weeks
runspercycle 20
tapecycle 25 tapes
to
dumpcycle 2 weeks
runspercycle 12
tapecycle 50 tapes
backups are working fine, but I'm confused by the following output
which is just an example
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jeffrey D Anderson jdander...@lbl.gov wrote:
I don't know if there is any real solution to that problem, though. amanda
tries to balance the load evenly among the runs in each dumpcycle. But
sometimes I'd rather she tried to keep me on a single tape, and then
13 matches
Mail list logo
