On 6/17/22 04:25, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
Hi,
If you run tar by hand on the DLE does it finish? After how much time?
Thanks for the suggestion. That made me notice that it was bogging down
dealing with a *very* deep directory that had been created by a buggy
process going into infinite rec
Hi,
If you run tar by hand on the DLE does it finish? After how much time?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:50:11AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 6/15/22 09:38, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consistently. I
On 6/15/22 09:38, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consistently. I
> don't see any recent changes on the server except possibly a change from
> kernel 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7 to 3.10.0-1160.66.1.el7 on Jun 2nd, but the
> problem didn't start until J
Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consistently. I
don't see any recent changes on the server except possibly a change from
kernel 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7 to 3.10.0-1160.66.1.el7 on Jun 2nd, but the
problem didn't start until June 6th.
The tar command is stuck trying to writ
nd /var/lib/amanda etc.. etc... is changed over to the new user (because the
uid# is the *real* presence of a user... not the stringy name).
Use "dpkg -V amanda-backup-server" and I think it'll check the
ownership/validity of the install. Remember .. the server has both server
early.
>
> I have no apology for the bizarre set of names and terms and invisible
> states it maintains. It is not easy to learn and an easier GUI
> version like "gitg" or something is far better, if you can because
> it's very hard to visualize in the first two years of
lize in the
first two years of use. Even so, things like local changes are good to make
and easy to stow away.
Restarting from a "reset --hard " or a nicer "checkout -b mineno2
..." is always possible... but beware as some changes you make can be lost.
On 5/11/19 9:32 AM, Gene
Despite changing the name in the rules file, its hard coded to be
amanda-backup in the .dsc files. GRRR
Without fixing this, how the hell do we get rid of the older version
trash when updateing it? Seems like a heck of a good question to me. Do
we expect the users to wear out find in
:10:36 +0100
> From: Charles Stroom
> To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: amanda backup fails, because of wrong suid settings
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is on Linux Opensuse 42.3 with amanda 3.5.1 compiled from tar
> file. Today I discovered that amcheck failed to run, whil
On Monday 10 December 2018 18:04:47 Elias Pereira wrote:
> Hello Helge,
>
> Thanks for the answer!!!
>
> In my cups webgui does not have that tiny triangle!!! Can you show me
> with a printscreen?
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM Helge Blischke
wrote:
> > > Am 10.12.2018 um 17:35 schrieb Elia
Sorry, but below replace "sticky bit" by "suid bit".
Charles
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 21:10:36 +0100
From: Charles Stroom
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: amanda backup fails, because of wrong suid settings
Hi all,
This is on Linux Opensuse 42
ent amdump failed:
From: amanda@fiume7.localnet (Amanda Backup)
To: root@fiume7.localnet
Subject: daily_backup FAIL: AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR ? 2, 0
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:29:02 +0100
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
*** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!
Org : daily_bac
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:21:00 -0500
Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 12:51:45 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> > May I request you end two irritants about the Debian version. It
> > creates a user, "backup". That's fine, although "amanda", say,
> > would avoid stepping on som
Steve,
The amanda-client can be run with any user.
The user is compiled in, but it doesn't need to be the same on the
amanda server and amanda-client.
What was the problem?
Jean-Louis
On 09/01/17 02:41 PM, Steve Wray wrote:
For what its worth, this creates problems with inter-operability
bet
For what its worth, this creates problems with inter-operability between
CentOS and Debian; we rebuilt the CentOS rpm for amanda client so it used
the backup user instead of amanda, as our amanda server was on Debian. We
tried hard but never found a way to configure this.
It would be nice to be ab
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 12:51:45 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> May I request you end two irritants about the Debian version. It creates
> a user, "backup". That's fine, although "amanda", say, would avoid
> stepping on some other user named "backup".
>
> The irritant is that debian makes the user
On Friday 18 July 2014 16:16:15 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
> Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on
Jul 18, 2014:
> > On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
> >
> > And Gene did reply:
> > > Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 1
ent: change “amandabackup” to your username
check that the location is right for you
change to “auth=bsd” if that’s what the
working node has
2. Edit /etc/services and add this line to the end of the file, if there is any
old amand
On Friday 18 July 2014 16:16:15 John Hein wrote:
> Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on Jul
> 18, 2014:
> > On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
> >
> > And Gene did reply:
> > > Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> > > > 14
Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on Jul
18, 2014:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
> And Gene did reply:
> > Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> > > 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:49:47 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> ps auxww | grep net
Except for PID's both machines are identical:
shop:
gene@shop:/etc$ ps auxww | grep net
root13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?SJul11 0:00 [netns]
root 1128 0.0 0.0 1984 6
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:38:36 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis
wrote:
> > Don't forget to check the logs on the server and the client, see
> > /var/log/Amanda/*, find the newest files in there and see what they
> > say.
>
> do a locate
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:24:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis
wrote:
> > I think you have a more basic network connectivity issue. If it were
> > a simple .amandahosts issue, you'd get an error message to that
> > affect, not 'connectio
On Jul 18, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 14:51:39 Debra S Baddorf did opine
> And Gene did reply:
>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
>>> already in use (errno = 98)). serv
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis wrote:
> Don't forget to check the logs on the server and the client, see
> /var/log/Amanda/*, find the newest files in there and see what they say.
do a locate(or a find / -iname “*am*” ) to find your amanda logs.
Joi puts his in /var/log
On Friday 18 July 2014 15:06:49 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > backup user on the server is amanda, but neither client machine even
> > has an amanda (or backup) user. Presumably its backup:backup on the
> > clients. The /var/b
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Joi L. Ellis wrote:
> I think you have a more basic network connectivity issue. If it were a
> simple .amandahosts issue, you'd get an error message to that affect, not
> 'connection reset by peer', which is a network thing.
>
> Don't forget to check the logs on
g bsdtcp for
several years.
About burned out, but I need this backup to work too.
>
>
> --
> Joi Owen
> System Administrator
> Pavlov Media, Inc
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org
> [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On Behalf
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:51:39 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
> > already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
> > 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {cnf_start
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:27:20 Jon LaBadie did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:26:38AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greeting Jean-Louis;
> >
> > Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
> > things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, wh
On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> backup user on the server is amanda, but neither client machine even has
> an amanda (or backup) user. Presumably its backup:backup on the clients.
> The /var/backups/.amandahosts files were different, so I made the failing
> machine match th
e all of them
to something modern, but until then...
--
Joi Owen
System Administrator
Pavlov Media, Inc
-Original Message-
From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On
Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 1:36 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject
On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
> already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
> 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {cnf_start_services} Service amanda failed
> to start and is deactivated.
> 14/7/18@12:09:37
On Friday 18 July 2014 13:24:12 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> > What do I check next?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> Since Olivier wrote that he only used xinetd once, I figured I’d best
> chime in. I use it all the time (not that I know very much about it
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:26:38AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greeting Jean-Louis;
>
> Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
> things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
> not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a singl
Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
> already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
More than one xinetd or inetd running?
Maybe some basic background is in order. The basic operation of
*inetd is pretty si
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:44:49 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Friday 18 July 2014 11:53:57 Jean-Louis Martineau did opine
> >
> > And Gene did reply:
> >> On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> > On Friday 18
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:11:24 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> > There is a /var/backups/.amandahosts file, its a link to
> > /etc/amandahosts BUT, in /etc/.amandahosts. I'll mv it to
> > /etc/amandahosts. Ran amcheck, no change and that file was not
> > accessed.
>
> The actual
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:11:24 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
> > There is a /var/backups/.amandahosts file, its a link to
> > /etc/amandahosts BUT, in /etc/.amandahosts. I'll mv it to
> > /etc/amandahosts. Ran amcheck, no change and that file was not
> > accessed.
>
> The actual
On Friday 18 July 2014 12:10:10 Charles Curley did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:34:16 +0700
>
> Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > > What do I check next?
>
> Firewall?
>
> That's bitten me more than once.
No firewalls running on any machine, I have a dd-wrt router between me and
wner-amanda-us...@amanda.org
> [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Gene Heskett Sent:
> Friday, July 18, 2014 10:39 AM
> To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: [BULK] Re: amrecover works, normal amanda backup, logging
> connection refused
>
> On Friday 18 July 2014
>
> What do I check next?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
Since Olivier wrote that he only used xinetd once, I figured I’d best chime in.
I use it all the time (not that I know very much about it). Here are parts of
my CHECKLIST
for a new node:
yum install openssh-server
yum in
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2014 11:53:57 Jean-Louis Martineau did opine
> And Gene did reply:
>> On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
>> >
>> > And Gene did reply:
>> >> Gene Heskett wrot
:10080 0.0.0.0:*
> >
> > IIRC thats good.
>
> It's not good, this is for bsd auth, you want to use bsdtcp.
I changed it according to Olivier, and now amcheck says connection reset
by peer, and errors back out quickly rather than waiting 10 seconds. Oh,
didn
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:53:57 Jean-Louis Martineau did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
> >
> > And Gene did reply:
> >> Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> >> > Trying to figure out
>
> There is a /var/backups/.amandahosts file, its a link to /etc/amandahosts
> BUT, in /etc/.amandahosts. I'll mv it to /etc/amandahosts. Ran amcheck,
> no change and that file was not accessed.
>
The actual file SHOULD have a dot at the beginning of the name.
.amandahosts
I guess if the
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:34:16 +0700
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > What do I check next?
Firewall?
That's bitten me more than once.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warra
v Media, Inc
-Original Message-
From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On
Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 10:39 AM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: amrecover works, normal amanda backup, logging connection
refused
O
On 07/18/2014 11:43 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:34:16 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /
On 07/18/2014 11:39 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of
> the things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box,
On Friday 18 July 2014 11:34:16 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
> Gene,
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greeting Jean-Louis;
> >
> > Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
> > things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop b
On Friday 18 July 2014 10:50:47 John Hein did opine
And Gene did reply:
> Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> > Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of
> > the things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works,
> > there is not an /etc/xine
Gene,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greeting Jean-Louis;
>
> Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
> things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
> not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a single st
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:26 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
> Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
> things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
> not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a single stanza
> amanda file in it.
>
>
Greeting Jean-Louis;
Trying to figure out why amanda can't backup this machine, one of the
things I noticed in /etc, is that on the shop box, which works, there is
not an /etc/xinetd.d but it has an old-xinetd.d with a single stanza
amanda file in it.
An ls -lau shows that file, /etc/old-xinet
mically with DHCP?
Jon
That doesn't mean you don't have other issues that have to be dealt
with. There is a general trouble shooting page for possible issues
that result in "selfcheck request failed" --
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
On 10/8/13 5:0
that have to be dealt
> >>with. There is a general trouble shooting page for possible issues
> >>that result in "selfcheck request failed" --
> >>http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
> >>
> >>
> >>On 10/8/13 5:08 AM, j
result in "selfcheck request failed" --
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
On 10/8/13 5:08 AM, jefflau wrote:
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning using it
in the workgroup without dns server.
I was Using Ubuntu 12
e issues
> that result in "selfcheck request failed" --
> http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
>
>
> On 10/8/13 5:08 AM, jefflau wrote:
> >Dear All,
> >I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning using
> >it
ve other issues that have to be dealt with. There is a general trouble
shooting page for possible issues that result in "selfcheck request failed" --
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Selfcheck_request_failed.
On 10/8/13 5:08 AM, jefflau wrote:
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda ba
Can you send the amanda.conf file?We need a little more information here.
[ If you are already discussing this with somebody, then never mind! ]
Deb
On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:08 AM, jefflau
wrote:
> Dear All,
> I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning
Dear All,
I was learning on Amanda backup and facing issue for below. I planning using it
in the workgroup without dns server.
I was Using Ubuntu 12 and installed it by using apt-get, by searching many of
the issue resolved. Till this stage I do a month can't resolved it.
Hope someone
> >
> > > I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but
> > > have noticed that the three times this has happened an
> > > amanda backup was running. I even moved the time of the
> > > backup to p
ave reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed that the
three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I even moved the
time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the holding disk
and final backup d
freeze of the system
> > (ie. no system log entries, but system [ie. disks] is still
> > running).
> >
> > I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed
> > that the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running.
> > I even m
gt;
> I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed that
> the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I even
> moved the time of the backup to prove the point
>
> I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the holdin
t; no system log entries, but system [ie. disks] is still running).
> >
> > I have reported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed
> > that the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I
> > even moved the time of the backup to prove th
ported this is an Ubuntu bug a while ago, but have noticed
> that the three times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I
> even moved the time of the backup to prove the point
>
> I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the
> holding disk and final b
times this has happened an amanda backup was running. I even
moved the time of the backup to prove the point
I'm running a RAID1, with one of my folders encrypted. Both the holding
disk and final backup disk are single disks.
My question is if anybody could think that amanada could be the
I'm evaluating possible solutions for "Drop in USB backup". as an
existing amanda user, I was interested by the possibility of having
amanda run a backup of a flash drive whenever it's connected. I've
got a few simple requirements for this backup operation. 1) a backup
should happen whenever a "
At Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:17:43 -0500 "Julian C. Dunn" wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2010 08:23 AM, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
> > on an RHEL 5 64-bit system. But I get an error as follows:
> >
> > # rpm -ivh --test amanda
On 11/17/2010 08:23 AM, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
on an RHEL 5 64-bit system. But I get an error as follows:
# rpm -ivh --test amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libtermcap.so.2
Hello,
They have already been installed.
# rpm -qa | grep termcap
libtermcap-2.0.8-46.1
libtermcap-devel-2.0.8-46.1
termcap-5.5-1.20060701.1
Thanks in advance,
Yogesh
--- On Fri, 11/19/10, Paddy Sreenivasan wrote:
From: Paddy Sreenivasan
Subject: Re: Error while installing amanda-backup
rote:
>
>
> From: Yogesh Hasabnis
> Subject: Error while installing amanda-backup-client on RHEL 5 64-bit
> To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:53 PM
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_6
Hi All,
I would appreciate your suggestions if any.
Thanks in advance,
Yogesh
--- On Wed, 11/17/10, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote:
From: Yogesh Hasabnis
Subject: Error while installing amanda-backup-client on RHEL 5 64-bit
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Date: Wednesday, November 17, 2010, 6:53 PM
Hi
Hi All,
I am trying to install amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm on an
RHEL 5 64-bit system. But I get an error as follows:
# rpm -ivh --test amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libtermcap.so.2 is needed by amanda-backup_client-2.6.1p2-
Chris,
No and Yes.
I have been running an amanda server on this particular system
for a while, but its not the system where I have been running
an amanda server that included PC/windows clients.
The system that has been working includes in /etc/services
the following.
> grep amand /etc/service
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Chris Hoogendyk
wrote:
> I don't mean to question Dustin
I rather enjoy being questioned, so don't worry about that!
This was a guess, and apparently I was correct this time around.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
We seem to be missing something in our config but I'm not finding
the key in the wiki. What should I be looking for ?
I'm guessing that amanda/tcp isn't in your services db? On most
systems, that's /et
Dustin,
Genious!
Of course we had upd defined in /etc/services but we
neglected to add a second definition on the same socket
id for upd.
It was of course present on the parallel system that was
working for PC but non-citrix clients.
thank you,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> We seem to be missing something in our config but I'm not finding
> the key in the wiki. What should I be looking for ?
I'm guessing that amanda/tcp isn't in your services db? On most
systems, that's /etc/services, but on Sun it might be v
We are running amanda server on Solaris 10 and the
client on a citrix box and trying to backup a virtual
machine on citrix.
Our config on the server is identical to similar setup
we have on another network
define dumptype zwc {
auto "bsdtcp"
maxdumps 1
compress client fast
program"DUMP"
}
but w
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ga jimenez55
> backupcentral.com> wrote:
>
> > amtape BackupSL24 update (or show)
> > amtape: scanning all 5 slots in tape-changer rack:
> > amtape: slot  5: Error reading Amanda header
> > amtape: slot  2: Error reading Amanda h
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ga jimenez55
wrote:
> amtape BackupSL24 update (or show)
> amtape: scanning all 5 slots in tape-changer rack:
> amtape: slot 5: Error reading Amanda header
> amtape: slot 2: Error reading Amanda header
Do those tapes have Amanda headers on them?
Dustin
--
i have this problem when i use those command i have this error
amtape BackupSL24 update (or show)
amtape: scanning all 5 slots in tape-changer rack:
amtape: slot 5: Error reading Amanda header
amtape: slot 2: Error reading Amanda header
I am trying that amanda read the tape's barcode of the
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> Are you sure of the size of your tape? 4Gb is with compression or not,
> Do your data are compressible or not, are you using software compression?
>
> Jean-Louis
>
The amount of data I backup every day is about 3.6 Gb. During the first cycle
when the tapes have
Are you sure of the size of your tape? 4Gb is with compression or not,
Do your data are compressible or not, are you using software compression?
Jean-Louis
mandaillou wrote:
Thanks for your prompt replies.
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, mandaillou
backupcentra
Thanks for your prompt replies.
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, mandaillou
> backupcentral.com> wrote:
>
> > On the forum, I found people facing the same problem and the error was
> > related to the tapecycle. Mine is 12 and I have 12 reusable tapes.
> >
>
> Righ
mandaillou wrote:
NOTES:
taper: tape DailySet-05 kb 1783648 fm 2 writing file: No space left on
device
The tape got full after 1783648 was written, you need bigger tape.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:06 AM, mandaillou
wrote:
> On the forum, I found people facing the same problem and the error was
> related to the tapecycle. Mine is 12 and I have 12 reusable tapes.
Right -- if you're doing 14 backups (2 weeks, every day), you're not
going to fit that on 12 tapes. Yo
Hi everybody :D
This is my first post in this forum and maybe not the last.
I'm a newbie using Amanda and I'm facing a problem with my backup.
I'm working with Amanda 2.5.2p1.1 under RHEL 3.
My backup strategy is really simple :
- full backup every day on 1 tape
- dumpcycle : 2 weeks
- tapecycle :
We actually made some changes on our system we're using for backing up(bigger
holding disk, sata2 instead of sata1) and we're backing up fresh again (using
the same tapes again)
Asssuming the tapes themselves are not broke (they are new tapes), hopefully
this will work this time. if it does g
Amanda writes data to tape as quickly as the tape drive will allow.
The tapespeed is not currently used.
The data may be in local cache, explaining some of the high speed. I
don't know SATA-1 rates off the top of my head to know if that's too
fast.
Whatever goes on, data corruption should not re
This is an edited version of a previous post
Hi,
We managed to up our speed of dumping and writing a whole lot by using a
holding disk, which is great. However, the data we wrote, around 245gb, failed
a amcheckdump and i couldnt, therefore, not amrestore anything.
After the amtapetes
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:39 PM, rory_f <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We managed to up our speed of dumping and writing a whole lot by using a
> holding disk, which is great. However, the data we wrote, around 245gb,
> failed a amcheckdump and i couldnt, therefore, not amrestore anything.
What wa
Hi
Are there users on the list using Amanda to backup Lustre file systems?
I would be interested in connecting to understand some of the details.
Thanks
tk
-
Ram "TK" Krishnamurthy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Friday 18 January 2008 17:27:52, vous avez écrit :
> In this case, I am starting amdump test by running:
>
> $amdump periodic&
>
> I did exit the shell, so perhaps the & command is not enough to
> prevent the SIGUP from being processed?
>
It is not. Putting a process in the background does NOT
In this case, I am starting amdump test by running:
$amdump periodic&
I did exit the shell, so perhaps the & command is not enough to
prevent the SIGUP from being processed?
Thanks,
Jordan
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:48 AM, John E Hein wrote:
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18, 2
John,
After looking up what you suggested, I'm almost entirely sure you're
right. If I start the job manually, I'll use nohup, disown or screen.
Thanks so much for your help!
Jordan
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:48 AM, John E Hein wrote:
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18, 2008:
G
Jordan Desroches wrote at 10:09 -0500 on Jan 18, 2008:
> Greetings all,
>
> In experimenting with AMANDA I've been running into a problem where
> I'll start a backup, everything will go swimmingly, and sometime down
> the line, the backup is stopped, and no AMANDA processes are running.
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
