Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
Hmm, well one problem is that that's a snapshot of the the 2.6.1
branch, which is pretty stable at this point. The other problem,
which Jean-Louis might be able to address, is that it's now almost
20090812, so we should probably have a new build installed by now.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jean-Louis
Martineaumartin...@zmanda.com wrote:
There is no new snapshot because there is no commit since 20090805.
Ah, so. I've been off my game!
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Jean-Louis
Martineaumartin...@zmanda.com wrote:
There is no new snapshot because there is no commit since 20090805.
Ah, so. I've been off my game!
Dustin
And I'd advise that one should not fix that which
I'm curious to know who out there is running the daily Amanda snapshots.
A *lot* of new code has gone in since the 2.6.1 release, and I'd like
to see it tested now, rather than waiting until the beta process
begins. We've rewritten the taper to use the transfer architecture;
rewitten all uses of
Our shop is running with zfs-snapshots.
We don't/haven't attempted ufs-snapshots.
Snapshots are great - but not the solution to all problems,
files that are open when the snapshots are created are 'open'
when you back them up (not everyone here seems to understand this).
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Snapshots are great - but not the solution to all problems,
files that are open when the snapshots are created are 'open'
when you back them up (not everyone here seems to understand this).
Sorry -- I meant the daily
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Alan Pearsonalandpear...@yahoo.com wrote:
You have to appreciate a lot of people have AMANDA in production
environments and it is working. We are very reluctant to change it in case
it breaks, we don't want the overhead of having to fix it.
Absolutely -- I
Hi Dustin
You have to appreciate a lot of people have AMANDA in production
environments and it is working. We are very reluctant to change it in case
it breaks, we don't want the overhead of having to fix it.
Example we are deploying a 2.5.2 snapshot that has fixes in it that we
raised.
Good points and I do appreciate the effort that is put into AMANDA and its
backwards compatibility.
I guess testing the client is easy, and something I will try to do over
the next few weeks and report the results, but changing the server side..
well that scares me :)
:)
--
AlanP
On Tue,
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
I'm curious to know who out there is running the daily Amanda snapshots.
A *lot* of new code has gone in since the 2.6.1 release, and I'd like
to see it tested now, rather than waiting until the beta process
begins. We've rewritten the taper
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Gene Heskettgene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
I have been following the 2.6.2 snapshots, usually within a day or so, for
several months. You've heard about it when I have problems, which isn't
often.
Thanks, Gene -- this has been a great help!
Dustin
--
Open
* Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com [20090811 10:34]:
I'm curious to know who out there is running the daily Amanda snapshots.
A *lot* of new code has gone in since the 2.6.1 release, and I'd like
to see it tested now, rather than waiting until the beta process
begins. We've rewritten
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jean-Francois
Malouinma...@bic.mni.mcgill.ca wrote:
Can you elaborate on the new chg-robot: I just downloaded the latest
snapshot for 2.6.1 (2.6.1p1-20090805) and I can't find anything
related to that.
Hmm, well one problem is that that's a snapshot of the the
13 matches
Mail list logo
