On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 at 11:11am, Gene Heskett wrote
> That mans your indices and such are all out of date by one run. I
On tape, they are, yes. But I store the taballs on a couple of different
servers with multi-disk-failure-proof RAIDs. It's not perfect, but it's
worked well me for this far.
>Looks like some temporary compressed index files from the current run
>should be there but are not. ...
>
>Do you see similar behavior ?
As Joshua said, this is to be expected. Amanda is creating those files
and removing them during the time GNU tar is also backing them up.
You *might* (haven'
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 09:31, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 at 9:04am, Guy Dallaire wrote
>
>> It's very rare that I don't come up here in the morning and don't
see
>> failed and strange dumps in my 10 machines backup.
>
>FAILED is a lot different than STRANGE.
>
>> Most o
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 at 9:04am, Guy Dallaire wrote
> It's very rare that I don't come up here in the morning and don't see
> failed and strange dumps in my 10 machines backup.
FAILED is a lot different than STRANGE.
> Most of the time, this occurs because some housekeeping/cleaning is
> between t
It's very rare that I don't come up here in the morning and don't see
failed and strange dumps in my 10 machines backup.
Most of the time, this occurs because some housekeeping/cleaning is
between the time the estimates and backups are done.
Most of the time, the message is there because a file d
