On Dec 5, 2000, Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2000, Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Do you mean that just by undefining GNUTAR_LISTED_INCREMENTAL_DIR,
>> > AMANDA is going to call tar using --incremental, instead of
>> > --l
>I am in the process of undefining GNUTAR_LISTED_INCREMENTAL_DIR and
>recompiling. ...
I think (but am not 100% certain) you can do this when you ./configure
by adding --without-gnutar-listdir. Make sure you do a "make
distclean" before re-running ./configure. Check config/config.h for
GNUTAR_
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2000, Chris Karakas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you mean that just by undefining GNUTAR_LISTED_INCREMENTAL_DIR,
> > AMANDA is going to call tar using --incremental, instead of
> > --listed-incremental?
>
> That's right.
...
> However, you'll still b
Johannes Niess wrote:
>
>
> Why do you use VFAT on the server? Samba can do it's job on all file
> systems. Unix/Linux file systems like ext2 allow for a much more
> flexible administration of Samba because you can use Samba's access
> control on top of standard Unix access rights.
>
Maybe I wa
Chris!
> My suspicion is that GNU tar, which I use in the version 1.12, somehow
> cannot compute incrementals right, for filesystems of vfat type that are
> mounted the way I described above...(?)
Eeck!
Even RedHat have a later version of GNU tar than 1.1.2 and (honestly)
they're not known to
"John R. Jackson" wrote:
>
> >I want to check the level 1 sizes that AMANDA reports. ...
>
> First of all, let's be clear here. It's not Amanda. It's your dump
> program that is reporting sizes. Amanda just uses them.
>
as I wrote in a previous posting, I wanted to wait a little and observ
