On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 01:06:36PM -0500, Paul Crittenden wrote:
> I have set up amanda-2.5.2p1 on Solaris 9, with it being the server and
> client. I have run amcheck with no errors. I can label tapes but when I
> run an amdump It fails. Here is the email I get.
>
> FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAIL
Think about the configuration as having network -- it's just that the
machine you are connecting to is the local machine. You have to
configure your setup for that just like you would if it were across the
wire.
Also, in general, be sure to check your logs. Not only the amanda logs
in /tmp/amanda/
Maybe localhost resolv to an IPv6 address and that network is not
configured?
>grep localhost /etc/hosts
>netstat -nr
Add 'debug_auth 1' to amanda.conf and retry.
Post the taper.*.debug and dumper.*.debug files.
Jean-Louis
Paul Crittenden wrote:
I have set up amanda-2.5.2p1 on Solaris 9, with
I have set up amanda-2.5.2p1 on Solaris 9, with it being the server and
client. I have run amcheck with no errors. I can label tapes but when I
run an amdump It fails. Here is the email I get.
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:54:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 07:49, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> > *IUWT-LWBE* (If users weren't there - Life would be easier)
>
> LOL... though in reality, it's
>
> IUWT-WBOOAJ
> If Users Weren't There - We'd Be Out Of A Job
True..
But life would still be pretty easy.. :) We have a well functioning
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 07:49, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> *IUWT-LWBE* (If users weren't there - Life would be easier)
LOL... though in reality, it's
IUWT-WBOOAJ
If Users Weren't There - We'd Be Out Of A Job
;^P
Eric
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice
and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
control in?
No X interface. But of course, you can use any X-c
> Anders Norrbring wrote:
>
> > Well, me too.. But, there are others using the system, and the don't
> always
> > 'settle' for a nightly backup of entire systems. They need (for a
> reason
> > I'm too stupid to understand) backups every now and then of files they
> need
> > to archive immediatel
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Well, me too.. But, there are others using the system, and the don't always
'settle' for a nightly backup of entire systems. They need (for a reason
I'm too stupid to understand) backups every now and then of files they need
to archive immediately (at any time *sigh*) and
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 06:21, Anders Norrbring wrote:
>> > Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
>> > I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a
>> > nice
>>
>> and
>>
>> > friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering
>> > and job control in?
>>
>
> > Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
> > I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice
> and
> > friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
> > control in?
>
> No X interface. But of course, you can use any X-capable editor to edit
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 10:43, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice and
> friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
> control in?
Exactly what led you to think that ? Can you provide references ? The idea
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
control in?
No X interface. But of course, you can use any X-capable editor to ed
Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
control in?
After what I've seen so far, trying to find any documentation at all, is
that it's completely
14 matches
Mail list logo
