Is this OK? Ignoring cruft file

Hi all, I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. Flushing the files from the holding disk results in NOTES: amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.2: ignoring cruft file. amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.3: ignoring cruft file. taper: tape xic03 kb 13511296 fm 58 [OK] Should I worry

Re: Is this OK? Ignoring cruft file

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 11:47:24AM +0200, Edwin Hakkennes wrote: Hi all, I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. Flushing the files from the holding disk results in NOTES: amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.2: ignoring cruft file. amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.3: ignoring

Re: Is this OK? Ignoring cruft file

--On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:47:24 +0200 Edwin Hakkennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. Flushing the files from the holding disk results in NOTES: amflush: beosrv-1._redhat.0.2: ignoring cruft file. amflush:

Re: Is this OK? Ignoring cruft file

On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:01, Frank Smith wrote: --On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:47:24 +0200 Edwin Hakkennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About 8G. Flushing the files from the holding disk results in NOTES: amflush:

Re: Is this OK? Ignoring cruft file

--On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:45:52 -0400 Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 15 August 2002 11:01, Frank Smith wrote: --On Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:47:24 +0200 Edwin Hakkennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I added a 'big' disk to my disklist yesterday. About

Re: Is this OK? Ignoring cruft file

On Thursday 15 August 2002 12:55, Frank Smith wrote: I've been corrected Frank, seems I'd missed the key word 'set', my bad. Can I plead alzheimers, or failing that, just plain stupidity? Maybe thats what I get for trying to keep my reading speeds up as the years pile up. :-) -- Cheers,