Hi
Gnutar doesn't keep a date file, it keep many state file in the gnutar-lists
directory.
Amanda keep it's /etc/amandates files but it is not use.
Jean-Louis
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:23:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 20:15:19 +0100
> "Stefan G.
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, "Steve" == Steve Manuel wrote:
Steve> The man page for amanda can be more explict about what backup
Steve> programs can be used and where they record the time-stamp.
If Amanda is going to modular such that it can use different backup
programs, it's probably a lot
In a message dated: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 20:15:19 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger" said:
>It says:
>
>> record - record the dump in /etc/dumpdates. Default: [record yes]
>
>which may lead to assume it doesn´t matter for GNUtar as has happened
>for Steve in this case.
Not only that, but:
Jon> Ta
Hi, Steve,
on Dienstag, 20. Jänner 2004 at 16:59 you wrote to amanda-users:
SM> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:23:23PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> We are looking forward to the results.
SM> Well, the results are in and it works WONDERFULLY. I saved enough
SM> tape on the very first run to
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:23:23PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> SM> Also, *is* this neccessary for incremental dumps?
>
> Short answer: yes.
>
> SM> Now, this assumes that setting "record" to yes works. I'll know by
> SM> tommorow.
>
> You don't have to SET "record yes". Just REMOVE "re
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:55:12PM -0600, Steve Manuel wrote:
>
> BTW, I don't remember any doc that listed all the dump programs and
> their corresponding time-stamp DB. Should this be listed in the man
> pages or somewhere else?
IIRC, the various dump programs all maintain their own dumpdate f
Hi, Steve,
on Samstag, 17. Jänner 2004 at 22:49 you wrote to amanda-users:
SM> # record - record the dump timestamp in the time-stamp-database of the
SM> # backup program (e.g. /etc/dumpdates, /etc/amandates ) This is
read by
SM> # the dump program for incr
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:03:39PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:35:28PM -0600, Steve Manuel wrote:
> >
> > Sure, I'll do that and let the list know. For the record (no pun
> > intended), where in the docs does is say that GNUtar need the
> > parameter "record" set to yes?
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 08:23:45PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on Samstag, 17. Jänner 2004 at 20:15 I wrote to amanda-users:
>
> SGW> I will try to make that point more explicit in the
> SGW> example/amanda.conf.
>
> I suggest this:
>
> # record - record the dump in the
Hi,
on Samstag, 17. Jänner 2004 at 20:15 I wrote to amanda-users:
SGW> I will try to make that point more explicit in the
SGW> example/amanda.conf.
I suggest this:
# record - record the dump in the time-stamp-database of the backup
# program (e.g. /etc/dumpdates for DUMP)
Hi, Jon,
on Samstag, 17. Jänner 2004 at 20:03 you wrote to amanda-users:
JL> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:35:28PM -0600, Steve Manuel wrote:
>>
>> Sure, I'll do that and let the list know. For the record (no pun
>> intended), where in the docs does is say that GNUtar need the
>> parameter "record"
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:35:28PM -0600, Steve Manuel wrote:
>
> Sure, I'll do that and let the list know. For the record (no pun
> intended), where in the docs does is say that GNUtar need the
> parameter "record" set to yes? I assumed it was only for DUMP? Where I
> got that assumption I don't
Hi, Steve,
on Samstag, 17. Jänner 2004 at 19:35 you wrote to amanda-users:
SM> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa tar
SM> tar-1.13.25-4.7.1
This should work out fine.
>> > record no <--- ???
>> Set this to yes (or remove the line) and try again.
>> I am not sure i
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:54:17AM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Which version? Has to be 1.13.25 -- nothing older, and nothing
> newer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa tar
tar-1.13.25-4.7.1
> >> - Which fs on the DLE?
> SM> Not sure I understand what you're looking for..
>
> Which fil
Steve Manuel:
> SM> Amanda has been working great for me except for a problem that I
can't
> SM> figure out. When I look through the report for the previous nightly
> SM> backup I noticed that all my level 1 backups were the approximately
> SM> the same size as the level 0 backups. I've scoured t
Hi, Steve,
on Freitag, 16. Jänner 2004 at 06:31 you wrote to amanda-users:
>> - Do you use GNUtar or DUMP for the DLE? (very hot candidate)
SM> GNUtar
Which version? Has to be 1.13.25 -- nothing older, and nothing
newer.
>> - Which fs on the DLE?
SM> Not sure I understand what you're looking fo
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:36:16PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Hi, Steve,
>
> on 15. Jänner 2004 at 18:17 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
> SM> Amanda has been working great for me except for a problem that I can't
> SM> figure out. When I look through the report for the previous nightly
>
Hi, Steve,
on 15. Jänner 2004 at 18:17 you wrote to amanda-users:
SM> Amanda has been working great for me except for a problem that I can't
SM> figure out. When I look through the report for the previous nightly
SM> backup I noticed that all my level 1 backups were the approximately
SM> the same
Amanda has been working great for me except for a problem that I can't
figure out. When I look through the report for the previous nightly
backup I noticed that all my level 1 backups were the approximately
the same size as the level 0 backups. I've scoured the man pages,
google, and FS options to
19 matches
Mail list logo
