Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-23 Thread John R. Jackson
OSF1... er. Digital Unix... er Tru64 Unix... well *whatever* they call it now. Can you run config.guess (from any GNU package) and send me the string so I know what to add to the switch statement? Marc Mengel [EMAIL PROTECTED] John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-23 Thread John R. Jackson
Yep. I *think* a space is necessary after the R, but could be wrong. Not on Solaris. We'll see about others that pop up. Does that make it into the invocations done within configure? ... Probably not (I'll have to dig into that a bit deeper). For now I've just added it for the Amanda

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-22 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, John R. Jackson wrote: Are there any other OS's that need -R? OSF1... er. Digital Unix... er Tru64 Unix... well *whatever* they call it now. - Marc Mengel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-21 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:56:00PM -0800, Anthony A. D. Talltree wrote: Thank you all for the advice, I got through make successfully after setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. However, after I've installed Amanda, there's a new problem. When I try to run any amanda executables, I get the following

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-21 Thread Mark Lin
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:45 PM Subject: Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8 Thank you all for the advice, I got through make successfully after setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. However, after I've installed Amanda, there's a new problem. When I try to run any amanda executables, I get

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-21 Thread John R. Jackson
This is why linking with -R is the better answer. ... Absolutely. LD_LIBRARY_PATH has a lot of really evil side effects and should be an absolute last resort. And, of course, most or all instances of 'configure' that I encounter fail completely ... That's interesting. Not long ago I

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-21 Thread Anthony A. D. Talltree
But now that you mention it, I suspect that for Solaris we should add -R$dir in addition to -L$dir. Right? Yep. I *think* a space is necessary after the R, but could be wrong. Not long ago I discovered Amanda had a --with-libraries option that took a list of directories and stuck them on the

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-20 Thread Mary Tan
cc: Subject: Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8 03/19/02 01:05

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-20 Thread Anthony A. D. Talltree
Thank you all for the advice, I got through make successfully after setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. However, after I've installed Amanda, there's a new problem. When I try to run any amanda executables, I get the following error: $ amlabel DailySet1 DailySet1-001 ld.so.1: amlabel: fatal:

Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-19 Thread Mary Tan
Hi all: I'm trying to run make for Amanda 2.4.2p2 on a Solaris 2.8 SPARC server with the following configure options: ./configure --with-user=amanda --with-group=amanda During the make process, the following error occurs. Here's the tail end of the error message: rm -f genversion.h

Re: Make problem on Solaris 2.8

2002-03-19 Thread Anthony A. D. Talltree
I suspect that you've got an ld.so path issue. The best way to deal with that is to have the linking invocations of gcc specify -R /where/ever/your/libs/are, with LD_LIBRARY_PATH unset.