Re: Restore from file, not tape

2007-11-01 Thread Linda Pahdoco
Jon LaBadie wrote: Amrecover, not amrestore, would be the command to extract a directory tree from that holding disk (or tape). If that is what you used, and you were unable to see the index of files in the dump, was the record parameter set to yes when the dump was made. No index is

Re: Restore from file, not tape

2007-11-01 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Linda Pahdoco wrote: Jon LaBadie wrote: Amrecover, not amrestore, would be the command to extract a directory tree from that holding disk (or tape). If that is what you used, and you were unable to see the index of files in the dump, was the record parameter set to yes when the dump was

Re: Restore from file, not tape

2007-11-01 Thread Linda Pahdoco
I'm manually extracting the files now based on the clues you all gave me. I'll come back to what broke once I get the customer back up. Thank you all for your suggestions. As usual - you're very helpful. :) LP

Restore from file, not tape

2007-10-31 Thread Linda Pahdoco
I was really hoping I could get the tape changer configured before this happened, but it bit me on the rear. Amanda 2.4.5 server. I've got a level 0 sitting on my disk. It's too large to fit on tape. I need to extract a directory from it. I know the entire path. It doesn't show up in my list

Re: Restore from file, not tape

2007-10-31 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:24:25PM -0500, Linda Pahdoco wrote: I was really hoping I could get the tape changer configured before this happened, but it bit me on the rear. Amanda 2.4.5 server. I've got a level 0 sitting on my disk. It's too large to fit on tape. I need to extract a