Hi,
i think all of you are right, but...
lets state a few things amanda does:
1.) you amlabel your tapes for use, and amanda put's them with
a date of 0 in its tapelist.
2.) the date of 0 in tapelist means: this tape has never been written
a backup to, it is a so called new tape.
3.) amanda will
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:28:02PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:26:59PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
Just a guess, but I'd say it's because 0 is not a valid date, so
those lines are being ignored completely.
Those lines are what results when you amlabel a tape. If
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:39:49AM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:28:02PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:26:59PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
Just a guess, but I'd say it's because 0 is not a valid date, so
those lines are being ignored
1) This morning, my amanda report said:
These dumps were to tape Indyme010.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
Instead of The next tape Amanda expects to use is: Indyme011.
Here's the tapelist:
20030226 Indyme010 reuse
20030225 Indyme009 reuse
20030221 Indyme008 reuse
20030220
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 at 11:33am, John Oliver wrote
These dumps were to tape Indyme010.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
Instead of The next tape Amanda expects to use is: Indyme011.
Here's the tapelist:
20030226 Indyme010 reuse
20030225 Indyme009 reuse
20030221
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:54:16PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
20030226 Indyme010 reuse
20030225 Indyme009 reuse
20030221 Indyme008 reuse
20030220 Indyme007 reuse
20030219 Indyme006 reuse
20030218 Indyme005 reuse
20030215 Indyme004 reuse
20030214 Indyme003 reuse
20030213
1) This morning, my amanda report said:
These dumps were to tape Indyme010.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
Instead of The next tape Amanda expects to use is: Indyme011.
Here's the tapelist:
20030226 Indyme010 reuse
20030225 Indyme009 reuse
20030221 Indyme008 reuse
20030220
On Wed February 26 2003 14:33, John Oliver wrote:
1) This morning, my amanda report said:
These dumps were to tape Indyme010.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
Instead of The next tape Amanda expects to use is: Indyme011.
Here's the tapelist:
20030226 Indyme010 reuse
20030225
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:38:46PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
I thought amanda would just read from the bottom of the list.
Nope, amanda goes by date first. List position is only significant
when 2 or more tapes have the same last-used date.
When it
was done with tape 009, 010 was at the
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:26:59PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:38:46PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
I thought amanda would just read from the bottom of the list.
Nope, amanda goes by date first. List position is only significant
when 2 or more tapes have the same
10 matches
Mail list logo
