Re: amanda/iptables problem

2002-10-21 Thread John Dalbec
John Dalbec wrote: I'm using Red Hat 7.1, kernel 2.4.9-34 w/ReiserFS quota patches. I've since rebuilt the kernel after doubling the UDP timeouts in ip_conntrack_proto_udp.c. So far this seems to be working... Thanks, John Dalbec

Re: amanda/iptables problem

2002-09-18 Thread John Dalbec
Galen Johnson wrote: John Dalbec wrote: I sometimes get sendsize packets being dropped by iptables, presumably because the iptables connection tracking decided the UDP connection was closed. This causes the estimates to take much longer because the first sendsize process gives up.

amanda/iptables problem

2002-09-17 Thread John Dalbec
I sometimes get sendsize packets being dropped by iptables, presumably because the iptables connection tracking decided the UDP connection was closed. This causes the estimates to take much longer because the first sendsize process gives up. Has anyone found a solution to this? Thanks, John

Re: amanda/iptables problem

2002-09-17 Thread Galen Johnson
John Dalbec wrote: I sometimes get sendsize packets being dropped by iptables, presumably because the iptables connection tracking decided the UDP connection was closed. This causes the estimates to take much longer because the first sendsize process gives up. Has anyone found a