Plus at least on 2.6, ufsdump cleans tar's clock when it comes to speed.
Dana Bourgeois
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 8:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
Plus at least on 2.6, ufsdump cleans tar's clock when it comes to speed.
Dana Bourgeois
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 8:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
Jon LaBadie wrote:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/backups_amanda.html
In the example config file we find these strange (wrong) values:
> dumpcycle 3 weeks # the number of days in the normal dump cycle
>
> runspercycle 8 # the number of amdump runs in dumpcycle days
>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:24:17PM +1300, Steve Wray wrote:
> Its interesting that they don't configure it to use gnu tar...
> and so far as I can tell, none of the config that they give
> would use gnutar to backup Solaris boxes.
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:02, Galen Johnson wrote:
> > Jon LaBa
Its interesting that they don't configure it to use gnu tar...
and so far as I can tell, none of the config that they give
would use gnutar to backup Solaris boxes.
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:02, Galen Johnson wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >Recently posted to the "Big Admin"
> >section of Sun's websi
Jon LaBadie wrote:
Recently posted to the "Big Admin"
section of Sun's website is a pretty
long article on setting up amanda.
Haven't read it yet, so I'm unable
to comment on its content.
http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=47250049-814460813:1068762499806
or
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/
Recently posted to the "Big Admin"
section of Sun's website is a pretty
long article on setting up amanda.
Haven't read it yet, so I'm unable
to comment on its content.
http://enews.sun.com/CTServlet?id=47250049-814460813:1068762499806
or
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/ba
