Re: amrecover and tape seeking

2004-06-11 Thread Jason Brooks
Hello, I found this in the amanda.conf.in file. It's new to me. I have been using my same amanda.conf file since 2.4.2p1, so go figure. amrecover_do_fsf yes# amrecover will call amrestore with the # -f flag for faster positioning of the tape. amrecover_check_label yes

Re: amrecover and tape seeking

2004-06-11 Thread Jason Brooks
Good question. I would like to know as well. As for me, I pretty much always pre-position to the file number with mt. I hadn't realized amanda didn't do that. Chris Miller wrote: "amadmin find" shows a record of the location on tape (record number) where each dump record exists. Given this i

Re: amrecover and tape seeking

2004-05-20 Thread Paul Bijnens
Chris Miller wrote: Why not use this information to get the record number and position the tape appropriately? Look for the config option in a recent amanda (2.4.4 or later) amrecover_do_fsf yes -- Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511 Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B

Re: amrecover and tape seeking

2004-05-20 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 19 May 2004 at 11:44pm, Chris Miller wrote > "amadmin find" shows a record of the location on tape (record number) > where each dump record exists. Given this information, why does amrecover > start at the beginning of the tape during a restore and read each record > sequentially on the ta

amrecover and tape seeking

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Miller
"amadmin find" shows a record of the location on tape (record number) where each dump record exists. Given this information, why does amrecover start at the beginning of the tape during a restore and read each record sequentially on the tape until it finds the correct record? I can significantly r