RE: amrecover problems on compressed DLEs

2016-11-01 Thread Ochressandro Rettinger
users@amanda.org' <amanda-users@amanda.org> Subject: RE: amrecover problems on compressed DLEs I tried to recover 4 or 5 times. It failed each time. I only ran one backup of that type, but amcheckdump said it was a good dump. I could try again. -Sandro From

Re: amrecover problems on compressed DLEs

2016-11-01 Thread Debra S Baddorf
unm.edu>; > 'amanda-users@amanda.org' <amanda-users@amanda.org> > Subject: Re: amrecover problems on compressed DLEs > > client compressed dump are decompressed by amrecover > server compressed dump are decompressed by amidxtaped (on the server) > > I tried many recovery

RE: amrecover problems on compressed DLEs

2016-11-01 Thread Ochressandro Rettinger
u [mailto:jmartin...@carbonite.com] Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 2:53 PM To: Ochressandro Rettinger <orettin...@salud.unm.edu>; 'amanda-users@amanda.org' <amanda-users@amanda.org> Subject: Re: amrecover problems on compressed DLEs You are doing client or server compression? The backu

amrecover problems on compressed DLEs

2016-10-31 Thread Ochressandro Rettinger
I'm running Amanda 3.4 (3.4.1?) from the zmanda RPM, on an RHEL 7.2 machine. My client is an RHEL 6.8 machine, running the same generation of client, also from the zmanda RPM. My disklist file was as follows: backuptest /slash/ {

amrecover problems

2007-05-16 Thread Martin Marcher
Hello, i tried to set up a mix of http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Test_environment_with_virtual_tapes and http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Quick_start now i can run backups but amrecover tells me about an invalid service (this is debian/etch if it matters in some way) if i add the -auth=bsd

Re: amrecover problems

2007-05-16 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Your inetd.conf must be: amanda dgram udp waitbackup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amandad -auth=bsd amdump amindexd amidxtaped Martin Marcher wrote: Hello, i tried to set up a mix of http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Test_environment_with_virtual_tapes and

Re: Amrecover problems

2005-02-04 Thread Jason Miller
Feb 2005 09:38:25 +0100 To: Jason Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Amrecover problems Jason Miller wrote: Has anyone ran across a issue while running amrecover where the file that is requested and extracted from recover is not at all the file you ended up with. The filename/extension

Amrecover problems

2005-02-03 Thread Jason Miller
Has anyone ran across a issue while running amrecover where the file that is requested and extracted from recover is not at all the file you ended up with. The filename/extension are correct but the actual content is not at all what the original was. So to illustrate what I am trying to say here

amrecover problems with indexes

2003-07-01 Thread Bob Zahn
I am having problems using amrecover. I can only see limited number of indexes and then follow them down to a file level. Most indexes do not seem to be there. When I do a 'ls' command I only see the 'opt/' directory or entry from the index files. amrecover setdisk /hostserver0/root Scanning

Re: amrecover problems with indexes

2003-07-01 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 at 2:22pm, Bob Zahn wrote And I also see the following entries in the same index file: .. 07665067355/./etc/lu/optfs 07665067356/./etc/vx/vras/.rdg 07665067403/./opt/SUNWstade/System/NETCONNECT .. 07665067405/./opt/SUNWstade/lib/auto/XML/LibXML/LibXML.bs

Re: amrecover problems ....

2003-02-14 Thread Frank Smith
--On Thursday, February 13, 2003 22:02:46 -0700 Jim Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to get amrecover to work. I have a single server running amanda, with an SDLT drive attached to it. All my clients are being backed up without problems. (I have done recent recoveries

amrecover problems ....

2003-02-13 Thread Jim Richard
I can't seem to get amrecover to work. I have a single server running amanda, with an SDLT drive attached to it. All my clients are being backed up without problems. (I have done recent recoveries "manually.") However, when I try to run amrecover from a client, when I issue the extract,

Re: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-05 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Hello James, What's the output of 'amadmin config find'?, amrecover will not use a dump that is not listed. Could you also provide your amindexd.*.debug file. Jean-Louis On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:39:03PM -0400, James Shearer wrote: Hello. I am new to amanda, and recently attempted a test

tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread James Shearer
Hello. I am new to amanda, and recently attempted a test recovery using amrecover. Alas, I did not get very far. I recieved the No index records for disk for specified date error, despite having enabled indexing in my amanda.conf. Google turned up alot of hits for this error, one of which

Re: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread Anthony Valentine
I get this error every time I run amrecover from a directory that isn't in my disklist, or from a host that isn't the backup server. Try using the sethost, setdisk, and setdate commands in amrecover. For example: sbs|amv: /tmp sudo amrecover Gemini AMRECOVER Version 2.4.2p2.

RE: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread James Shearer
I get this error every time I run amrecover from a directory that isn't in my disklist, or from a host that isn't the backup server. Try using the sethost, setdisk, and setdate commands in amrecover. Yep. I've tried that before. It's still no good, as you can see: #

Re: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread Frank Smith
--On Friday, October 04, 2002 13:39:03 -0400 James Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I am new to amanda, and recently attempted a test recovery using amrecover. Alas, I did not get very far. I recieved the No index records for disk for specified date error, despite having enabled

RE: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread James Shearer
I'm not sure editing is a fix. Someone on this list reported that restoring from one of the bad tar archives resulted in the files being OK but the directories were all renamed (I think to big numbers), and that if you knew what the paths were supposed to be you could (with a lot of work)

RE: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread Anthony Valentine
Well, so much for that. . . What do the directories and data look like in your curinfo directory? I don't remember if that tar problem corrupts it also. Anthony On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 10:26, James Shearer wrote: I get this error every time I run amrecover from a directory that isn't

Re: tar, amrecover problems

2002-10-04 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:26:36PM -0400, James Shearer wrote: I get this error every time I run amrecover from a directory that isn't in my disklist, or from a host that isn't the backup server. Try using the sethost, setdisk, and setdate commands in amrecover. Yep. I've tried

amrecover problems

2002-06-11 Thread M. Cao
Can you explain the error on last line (Can't determine disk and mount point from $CWD ) The index shows 20 files had been backup on the tape. But I can not list any file from amrecover bash-2.05# ./amrecover daily AMRECOVER Version 2.4.2p2. Contacting server on bouncer ... 220 bouncer

Re: amrecover problems

2002-06-11 Thread Stephen Carville
Use setdisk to tell amrecover what backup you want to restore from. On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, M. Cao wrote: - - - Can you explain the error on last line (Can't determine disk and mount - point from $CWD ) - - The index shows 20 files had been backup on the tape. But I can not list - any file from

Amrecover problems.

2002-02-21 Thread Javier.Fernandez
hi everyone. Well, i have three machines with amanda, my disklist is sc01us0105/ user-tar sc01us0103.cf.jcyl.es / user-tar sc01us0103.cf.jcyl.es /global/datos2/esri-web

Re: amrecover problems

2001-07-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 26, 2001, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it make the things run slower if a program is ALWAYS compiled with -g? Not when using GCC. In fact, that's the reason why configure uses CFLAGS=-O2 -g by default, when the compiler is GCC. GCC generates exactly the same code,

Re: amrecover problems

2001-06-27 Thread John R. Jackson
Does it make the things run slower if a program is ALWAYS compiled with -g? In general, yes. How much is highly dependent on the program. For instance, if it's I/O bound or always doing system calls, then optimization doesn't buy you much. But it can be very noticeable in surprising places

Re: amrecover problems

2001-06-27 Thread Benjamin Hyatt
John R. Jackson wrote: You need to rebuild everything, not just amidxtaped, because of the Amanda libraries it brings in. But you only need to install/test the resulting amidxtaped binary. With --disable-shared involved, it should be self-contained. did a 'make distclean' export CFLAGS=-g

Re: amrecover problems

2001-06-27 Thread John R. Jackson
#3 0x13b48 in debug_printf (format=0x1bb70 %s: version %s\n) at debug.c:64 #4 0x127a0 in main (argc=0, argv=0xffbefd14) at amidxtaped.c:149 Oh, that problem. You're inetd.conf line is probably wrong. I'm betting you forgot to put amidxtaped twice, e.g.: amidxtape stream tcp nowait backup

Re: amrecover problems

2001-06-27 Thread Benjamin Hyatt
John R. Jackson wrote: You're inetd.conf line is probably wrong. I'm betting you forgot to put amidxtaped twice, e.g.: You are correct argh! always the small details ;) amidxtape stream tcp nowait backup /opt/amanda/libexec/amidxtaped amidxtaped Without that trailing amidxtaped,

Re: amrecover problems

2001-06-26 Thread Benjamin Hyatt
John R. Jackson wrote: That's not enough information to go on, but is the critical piece of the puzzle. Please recompile amidxtaped with -g and reinstall it, then see if you can get a traceback with actual routine names and line numbers. John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist,

Re: amrecover problems

2001-06-26 Thread John R. Jackson
Okay I have modified CFLAGS in restore-src/Makefile -g and recompiled. The end result is a file size not much bigger than amidxtaped without debug. Shouldn't amidxtaped with debug be substantially bigger? Probably. It's not easy getting Amanda compiled with debugging in the GNU

Re: Amrecover problems

2001-06-13 Thread Arjan Molenaar
Hi, Amrecover wants a reserved port (=1024) for itself. Seems like you have to rebuild it ;-). (Dunno *why*, but it does...) Regards, Arjan Nate Burton wrote: I was able to run amdump and it appears that everything ran and backed up correctly, based on the logs and the Amanda report.

Re: Amrecover problems

2001-06-13 Thread John R. Jackson
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.0. Contacting server on admin1.airscorp.com ... amrecover: did not get a reserved port: 50012 Yup, that appears to be broken. You do understand, don't you, that 2.5 is the development version and only folks prepared to do serious debugging on their should go down path,

Re: Amrecover problems

2001-06-13 Thread Nate Burton
I don't mind working with the development version. I did get it working, on the suggestion of someone else, I recompiled with the portrange = 1024 and everything works fine. Thanks Nathanael Burton On Wednesday 13 June 2001 16:11, John R. Jackson wrote: AMRECOVER Version 2.5.0. Contacting

Amrecover problems

2001-06-12 Thread Nate Burton
I was able to run amdump and it appears that everything ran and backed up correctly, based on the logs and the Amanda report. Now I am trying to test and see if I can recover some files. When I run amrecover it is not connecting: admin2 is the client, admin1 is the server

Re: amrecover problems

2001-05-30 Thread John R. Jackson
A nice core file exists as well :( GDB and backtrace of the core I get the following: Core was generated by `'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation Fault. #0 0xff136dec in ?? () (gdb) where #0 0xff136dec in ?? () #1 0xff181c40 in ?? () #2 0x12e8c in main () #3 0x12460 in main ()

Re: amrecover problems

2000-11-27 Thread John R. Jackson
What's in amidxtaped.debug on amanda??? Nothing that tells me anything, that's the problem. But it might mean something to someone else. :-) I currently have a restore going, so as soon as it finishes, I'll rerun it and let you know. OK. One question I have though is, should I have to

Re: amrecover problems

2000-11-25 Thread John R. Jackson
EOF, check amidxtaped.debug file on amanda. Would it help if we made this message 72 point, bold and rang the bell? :-) :-) What's in amidxtaped.debug on amanda??? Paul John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: amrecover problems

2000-11-25 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 17:09:24 EST "John R. Jackson" said: EOF, check amidxtaped.debug file on amanda. Would it help if we made this message 72 point, bold and rang the bell? :-) :-) Probably not, but it might be a fun touch to add ;) What's in amidxtaped.debug on