And, actually, we did not yet see how many times this DLE
was dumped with level 0.
Can you post the output of amadmin config balance and
amoverview config (or mail it to me if it contains
too much private information).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amadmin IS balance
due-date #fs
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amadmin IS balance
due-date #fsorig KB out KB balance
--
3/16 Thu0 0 0 ---
3/17 Fri0 0 0 ---
3/18 Sat0 0
On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
And, actually, we did not yet see how many times this DLE
was dumped with level 0.
Can you post the output of amadmin config balance and
amoverview config (or mail it to me if it contains
too much private information).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
And, actually, we did not yet see how many times this DLE
was dumped with level 0.
Can you post the output of amadmin config balance and
amoverview config (or mail it to me if it contains
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:43:30AM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amadmin IS balance
due-date #fsorig KB out KB balance
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:27 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:43:30AM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Should you decide to consolidate, I'd recommend you NOT
do it all in one
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
and bumpdays? They may have an affect on your situation.
This could really be it.
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
and bumpdays? They may have an affect on your situation.
This could really be it.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
If that didn't solve your issues you maybe share your config with us.
This would help to get the picture.
Here are the 2 parts of the config:
I took the
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
If that didn't solve your issues you maybe share your config with us.
This would help to get the
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 04:48, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
and bumpdays? They may have an
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 07:03, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
and bumpdays? They may have an
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
I removed all tapes from the config. I just save to the holding disk. I
can live with the daily tape error, but I want amanda to do less full
backups.
||
|| holdingdisk hd1 {
|| comment main holding disk for IS
|| directory /data/amanda/IS
|| use -1
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Here are the 2 parts of the config:
I took the liberty of deleting the comments and unneeded
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 17:27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Here are the 2 parts of the config:
Amazing
On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a record yes
setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
the last full dump was done? It is needed for dump, but I'm
uncertain about gnutar.
I think you hit the nail right on the
Paul Bijnens schrieb:
On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a record yes
setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
the last full dump was done? It is needed for dump, but I'm
uncertain about gnutar.
I think you
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:05:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 17:27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
I know you are not using tape now, but whenever you run
amcheck (you do don't right?) it will complain tapecycle
less than runspercycle.
I do call amcheck from a script
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 18:13 schrieb Paul Bijnens:
On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a record yes
setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
the last full dump was done? It is needed for dump, but I'm
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
I ran a amadmin config disklist right now and here is one example for the
disks I encountered many level 0 backups.
host springfield.edvz.sbg.ac.at:
interface default
disk /:
program GNUTAR
priority 1
dumpcycle 6
Thomas Widhalm schreef:
I ran a amadmin config disklist right now and here is one example for the
disks I encountered many level 0 backups.
host springfield.edvz.sbg.ac.at:
interface default
disk /:
program GNUTAR
priority 1
dumpcycle 6
maxdumps 1
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:10:15PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 18:13 schrieb Paul Bijnens:
On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a record yes
setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 11:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Here are the 2 parts of the config:
[...]
I don't think
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:59 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3)
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:54, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:59 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi!
We
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:59 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
and
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:03, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:54, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
dumpcycle 8 days. amanda run from a script within crontab every
day.
There was an etc. up there.
Presumably your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
and bumpdays? They may have an affect on your situation.
This could really be it. bumpsize was set 100Mb. Maybe, because this
setup was used to backup on
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old for vdisks, we just backup
to the holding disk. But it makes lots of level 0 backups. Some
filesystems have level 0 just every day!
Is there a way to make level incemental
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old for vdisks, we just backup
to the holding disk. But it makes lots of level 0 backups. Some
filesystems have level 0 just every day!
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old for vdisks, we just backup
to the holding disk. But it makes lots
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old
Hi, NG!
I do night backup from all servers and PC's and 3 daily backups to
holding disk, and after that amflush (All this backups is incrementals)
All backup files is with level 0.
Once weekly I do full backup.
That happened after upgrading to new version.
Thanks,
Leonid
Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Leonid Shulov schreef:
Hi, NG!
I do night backup from all servers and PC's and 3 daily backups to
holding disk, and after that amflush (All this backups is incrementals)
All backup files is with level 0.
Once weekly I do full backup.
That happened after upgrading to new version.
Is this a
34 matches
Mail list logo
