Re: buggy gnutar

2003-01-18 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
* Joshua Baker-LePain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030117 16:54] thus spake: On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 at 4:17pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote So after going through some index files and cleaning them and verifying that amrecover can deal with them I wonder what else might have gone wrong using this

Re: buggy gnutar

2003-01-17 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 at 4:17pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote So after going through some index files and cleaning them and verifying that amrecover can deal with them I wonder what else might have gone wrong using this gnutar version. ISTR that the backups themselves are actually fine. Does

Re: buggy gnutar

2003-01-17 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 17 January 2003 16:17, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: Hello, [...] Does someone knows which sub-version of gnutar 1.13 are affected with this bug? Its generally agreed that 1.13-19 and 1.13-25 do _not_ suffer from this bug. The newest, 1.13-25 version you have to get from