Re: caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-07 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:35 AM, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious... Why doesn't a wiki search for gnutar or gnu tar find this? The wikimedia search is based on MySQL's full-text search, which isn't very good. In particular, it doesn't index or find words of three or fewer char

Re: caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-07 Thread John Hein
Jon LaBadie wrote at 01:57 -0400 on Sep 7, 2008: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 01:46:50AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:44:11PM -0600, John Hein wrote: > > > Someone may already know about this, but using gtar > 1.15.1 and > > > amanda < 2.5.1 will not work very well. >

Re: caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-07 Thread John Hein
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote at 10:01 -0400 on Sep 7, 2008: > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:44 AM, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There was a zmanda wiki page that described issues with various gnutar > > and amanda version combinations, but I can't seem to find it at the > > moment (the sea

Re: caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-07 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:44 AM, John Hein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was a zmanda wiki page that described issues with various gnutar > and amanda version combinations, but I can't seem to find it at the > moment (the search doesn't turn it up that I saw). > > If someone finds it, let me k

Re: caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 01:46:50AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:44:11PM -0600, John Hein wrote: > > Someone may already know about this, but using gtar > 1.15.1 and > > amanda < 2.5.1 will not work very well. > > > > The format of the "listed incremental" file has changed

Re: caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:44:11PM -0600, John Hein wrote: > Someone may already know about this, but using gtar > 1.15.1 and > amanda < 2.5.1 will not work very well. > > The format of the "listed incremental" file has changed. Among other > things, the entries are now separated by '\0' "null" b

caution: gtar 1.20 & amanda < 2.5.1

2008-09-06 Thread John Hein
Someone may already know about this, but using gtar > 1.15.1 and amanda < 2.5.1 will not work very well. The format of the "listed incremental" file has changed. Among other things, the entries are now separated by '\0' "null" bytes rather than newlines. [I'm not exactly sure why since it doesn'