Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: However amadmin info' still reports only one tape at level 0. Is this the expected behaviour? It's expected behavior, 'amadmin info' reports only the tape for the last PART. Jean-Louis

Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Replying to myself...see at the bottom... * Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080305 11:30]: Ok, here I go again. amanda-2.5.2p1 server and client debian/etch. I have seen this in the past (last Oct iirc) and I remember that Jean-Louis provided me with a patch but that was for the

Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Anyone on this please? I know, it's not as sexy as 2.6.x :) * Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080305 12:30]: Ok, here I go again. amanda-2.5.2p1 server and client debian/etch. I have seen this in the past (last Oct iirc) and I remember that Jean-Louis provided me with a patch but

Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone on this please? I know, it's not as sexy as 2.6.x :) I'm confused. I was hoping someone else understood the problem and would reply. # /opt/amanda/sbin/amfetchdump -p -d /dev/nrst0 left1 \ bigbrain

Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Bcc: Subject: Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content? Reply-To: In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Dustin J. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080306 13:56]: On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone on this please? I know

Re: [bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Jean-Francois, It's a known bug in amrecover, (will be fixed in 2.6.0b3). it try to recover from dump even if not all part are available. From amdadmin, only part 158, 159 and 160 are available. You said all the parts are available on tapes, but why amadmin doesn't list them? Did it gives

[bis] discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Ok, here I go again. amanda-2.5.2p1 server and client debian/etch. I have seen this in the past (last Oct iirc) and I remember that Jean-Louis provided me with a patch but that was for the case of a succesfully retried DLE. In this particular case there was no retry but nevertheless amadmin and

Re: discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: * Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20071030 10:40]: This bug is fixed in 2.5.3alpha, but the patch was not backported to 2.5.2p1. Can you try the attached patch? Looks like the patch did it. amadmin now reports correctly and amfetchdump can

Re: discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20071030 10:40]: This bug is fixed in 2.5.3alpha, but the patch was not backported to 2.5.2p1. Can you try the attached patch? Looks like the patch did it. amadmin now reports correctly and amfetchdump can restore the dump. Thanks! jf

Re: discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

This bug is fixed in 2.5.3alpha, but the patch was not backported to 2.5.2p1. Can you try the attached patch? Jean-Louis Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: Hi, With amanda-2.5.2p1 I did an archive a few days ago and trying to restore it caused me a few problems: amfetchdump tells me that there is

discrepency between amadmin, logs and tape content?

Hi, With amanda-2.5.2p1 I did an archive a few days ago and trying to restore it caused me a few problems: amfetchdump tells me that there is no valid data to be restored for that date and amadmin reports a connection timeout: grumpy: /opt/amanda/sbin/amfetchdump -p -d /dev/nst1