our
setup?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John R. Jackson
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 6:40 PM
> To: Jeff Heckart
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: large filesystem problems
>
>
> You might also do
Heckart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large filesystem problems
>not a typo. I did this four times and had an average of 1.6mb/s. That is
>awful.
True, but it sure explains a lot of things :-).
>Do you feel it a problem to have both the scsi3 internal drive and the raid
>
>not a typo. I did this four times and had an average of 1.6mb/s. That is
>awful.
True, but it sure explains a lot of things :-).
>Do you feel it a problem to have both the scsi3 internal drive and the raid
>on the same controller? ...
I'd have to ask a local expert, which I'll do Monday if
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John R. Jackson
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 6:40 PM
To: Jeff Heckart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large filesystem problems
>...that was actually all that consisted of the log. Does that tell
>you a
>...that was actually all that consisted of the log. Does that tell
>you anything?
It all fits together with the Amanda server only waiting 45 minutes but
the estimates taking much longer than that.
>Does the disk having a problem seem like the most logical from your
>perspective? This is abou
think.
Thank you very much,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: John R. Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 5:19 PM
To: Jeff Heckart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large filesystem problems
>4- How would I find the version of dump that I am using? ...
I
>4- How would I find the version of dump that I am using? ...
I wouldn't know. I just remember (from stories posted here) that on
Linux, you want the latest and greatest because old versions had a lot
of trouble.
>sendsize: debug 1 pid 5846 ruid 213 euid 213 start time Fri Apr 6 07:07:11
>200
ave dtimeout set for 1 in amanda.conf. Why
would the estimate be only 45min??
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: John R. Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Jeff Heckart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large filesystem problems
>When I run amdump,
>When I run amdump, everything appears to be ok, but I use amcheck and it
>tells me that it is "getting estimate" ...
Huh? Amcheck doesn't issue that kind of message. Could you post exactly
what you did and what it said back?
What version of Amanda are you using? What version of dump? What f
* Jeff Heckart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:42:50AM -0400)
> Hello.
>
> I have recently added a disk that is roughly 60gb in size. One of the
> partitions is about 51gb. This particular machine is running bsdi4.2. This
> and the tapeserver are running amanda 2.4.2.
>
> My tape
Hello.
I have recently added a disk that is roughly 60gb in size. One of the
partitions is about 51gb. This particular machine is running bsdi4.2. This
and the tapeserver are running amanda 2.4.2.
My tape server is a redhat 6.1 machine, and is successfully backing up three
other systems. I a
11 matches
Mail list logo
