Hi there,
I've been reading this thread;
http://www.mail-archive.com/amanda-users@amanda.org/msg27491.html
which is interesting because we've been experiencing a very similar
problem since upgrading 2.6.8 to 2.6.9 on a small cluster here.
The amanda connection tracking is all built into the
I know this seems a bit late,
I just moved to linux 2.6.9 after reading about ip_conntrack_amanda and
config_ip_nf_amanda fixes. However, I am somewhat confused, I encounted
the parse of reply message failure error even though 2.6.9 (based on my
reading) contained the patch code?
Should I have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:11:18AM -0500, foo wrote:
I was wrong, it turns out to be ip_conntrack_amanda from netfilter
that's the culprit. I haven't tested yet, but others have confirmed it.
I thought that was fixed in kernel 2.6.6 or did it break again? See:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 10:12:25AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:11:18AM -0500, foo wrote:
I was wrong, it turns out to be ip_conntrack_amanda from netfilter
that's the culprit. I haven't tested yet, but others have confirmed it.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On further inspection, it's a kernel problem - bad UDP checksums.
I'll go bug them now. :)
To avoid falling in the same trap, what kernel version was that?
--
Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511
Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:48:23AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On further inspection, it's a kernel problem - bad UDP checksums.
I'll go bug them now. :)
To avoid falling in the same trap, what kernel version was that?
2.6.9. I have a dozen other machines
On Thursday 04 November 2004 04:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:48:23AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On further inspection, it's a kernel problem - bad UDP checksums.
I'll go bug them now. :)
To avoid falling in the same trap, what kernel
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:11:18AM -0500, foo wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:48:23AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
To avoid falling in the same trap, what kernel version was that?
2.6.9. I have a dozen other machines running 2.6.9 without this
problem, though. I'm not 100% sure, but it
I have a client that's been working fine for many months, and after I
recently rebooted it to boot a newer version of the Linux kernel, I
started getting this for all of its filesystems:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
albarino / lev 2 FAILED [[parse of reply message failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a client that's been working fine for many months, and after I
recently rebooted it to boot a newer version of the Linux kernel, I
started getting this for all of its filesystems:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
albarino / lev 2 FAILED [[parse of reply message
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
First, I don't find that errormessage in the sources of 2.4.4p3, the
current stable version. So there are some changes since 2.4.2p2
that would change/solve that behaviour... (or at least produce
a better error message).
Also
On further inspection, it's a kernel problem - bad UDP checksums.
I'll go bug them now. :)
Thanks,
-ryan
Title: FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
Hi there,
Newbie question, I'm running amanda server on Debian Linux
amanda-server 2.4.2p2-4
I get the above parse error 'parse of reply message failed'
when backing up a Solaris 2.6 client running amanda-2.4.4
Does anyone have any idea
Title: RE: FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 03:05:57PM +0100, Yeates, Stephen [Heanet] wrote:
Hi there,
Newbie question, I'm running amanda server on Debian Linux
amanda-server 2.4.2p2-4
I get the above parse error 'parse of reply message failed'
when
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 03:05:57PM +0100, Yeates, Stephen [Heanet] wrote:
Hi there,
Newbie question, I'm running amanda server on Debian Linux
amanda-server 2.4.2p2-4
I get the above parse error 'parse of reply message failed'
when backing up a Solaris 2.6 client running amanda
there,
Newbie question, I'm running amanda server on Debian Linux
amanda-server 2.4.2p2-4
I get the above parse error 'parse of reply message failed'
when backing up a Solaris 2.6 client running amanda-2.4.4
Does anyone have any idea what may be causing this parsing error.
A Google serch
Chris Marble wrote:
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Amanda-2.4.3b4 on client is broken and will not talk correctly with
older server, upgrade your client to 2.4.3
Okay, upgrade done. I'll find out tonight.
Dumps appear to have gone sucessfully. If only I'd asked before spending
as much
are:
/-- Psi.chem /var lev 0 FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
\
/-- Psi.chem /usr/local lev 0 FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
\
/-- Psi.chem / lev 0 FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
\
I've never seen any message like this before. I've checked
Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Amanda-2.4.3b4 on client is broken and will not talk correctly with
older server, upgrade your client to 2.4.3
Okay, upgrade done. I'll find out tonight.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - HMC UNIX Systems Manager
I have just upgraded Amanda on one client (FreeBSD 4.6.2) to 2.4.3b4,
and now I get the following message in the mail-report:
kas-barbar ad0s3e lev 1 FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
kas-barbar ad0s3g lev 0 FAILED [[parse of reply message failed]]
kas-barbar ad0s3a lev 0 FAILED
20 matches
Mail list logo