On Monday, November 15, 2010 07:21:15 am Jean-Louis Martineau did opine:
> Don't use tar-1.24 or 1.25, they don't works with amanda according to:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-...@gnu.org/msg02993.html
>
> Jean-Louis
>
Which with careful reading, explains why the dumps have been so darned
Don't use tar-1.24 or 1.25, they don't works with amanda according to:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-...@gnu.org/msg02993.html
Jean-Louis
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday, November 14, 2010 02:48:23 am Jean-Louis Martineau did opine:
It probably did a level 0 because it was time to do it.
It probably did a level 0 because it was time to do it. What's the
dumpcycle? When was the last level 0?
Post the amdump.1 log file.
Gene Heskett wrote:
From the canary;
Someone using tapes which do have a fixed, finite size, is going to get
bitten, but so far my messages appear to be going t
>From the canary;
Someone using tapes which do have a fixed, finite size, is going to get
bitten, but so far my messages appear to be going to a black hole.
Whenever planner advances the backup level to a level 4, the rest of
the system treats it as if it was a level 0.
I can raise the BUMPMUL
