Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a 1.5TB
raid splitted/chunked in ~70 DLEs (using gtar) and some of them don't
make it to tape as the planner timeouts. Now, would someone be
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051207 07:41]:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a 1.5TB
raid splitted/chunked in ~70 DLEs (using gtar) and some of them don't
make it
Replying to myself,
* Jean-Francois Malouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051207 16:03]:
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20051207 07:41]:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a
Hi,
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a 1.5TB
raid splitted/chunked in ~70 DLEs (using gtar) and some of them don't
make it to tape as the planner timeouts. Now, would someone be kind
enough to jolt my memory as to what is the relationship between UDP
packet size and
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
I've got this amanda client (server and client at v2.4.5) with a 1.5TB
raid splitted/chunked in ~70 DLEs (using gtar) and some of them don't
make it to tape as the planner timeouts. Now, would someone be kind
enough