Hi Gene,
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 15 September 2005 09:11, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura enlightened us:
tapecycle is the total number of tapes; only these tapes are rotated,
right?
Not exactly. tapecycle is
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura enlightened us:
tapecycle is the total number of tapes; only these tapes are
On Thursday 15 September 2005 09:11, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura
enlightened us:
Hi. There are a couple of parameters on amanda.conf that I can't
figure out exactly their meaning, even after reading the man pages a
thousand times:
- dumpcycle, in days
- runspercycle, in number of amdumps
- tapecycle, in number of tapes
tapecycle is the total number of tapes; only these
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura enlightened us:
Hi. There are a couple of parameters on amanda.conf that I can't
figure out exactly their meaning, even after reading the man pages a
thousand times:
- dumpcycle, in days
- runspercycle, in number of amdumps
-
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 03:41:34PM +0100, Rodrigo Ventura enlightened us:
tapecycle is the total number of tapes; only these tapes are rotated,
right?
Not exactly. tapecycle is the minimum number of tapes that will be used
before any single tape can
