On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:10:54AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> The only thing I've come up with is "Enough 'Fine' Data Already", but
> that's just reusing the joke of the 3rd name. I'm open to suggestions...
DINE -- does it never end?
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 10:20, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:10:54AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>>> instead an internal IDE drive, they went out and got a 250GB
>>> drive and installed it before I revisited. Until now I've
>>> never seen a 240GB file system :))
>>
>> Bah:
>
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 10:10, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 at 10:02am, Gene Heskett wrote
>
>> >Even More F..ing Data ?
>>
>> Are we allowed to chuckle here? From the nameing convention used,
>> that would be the next logical progression. But now I wonder what
>> the 4th lashup
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 at 10:20am, Jon LaBadie wrote
> BRAGGART!! :))
Actually, it's more of a plea for sympathy. They keep filling it all up,
the little bastards.
> > The only thing I've come up with is "Enough 'Fine' Data Already", but
> > that's just reusing the joke of the 3rd name. I'm ope
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:10:54AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
>> instead an internal IDE drive, they went out and got a 250GB
>> drive and installed it before I revisited. Until now I've
>> never seen a 240GB file system :))
>
> Bah:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jlb]$ df -h
> Filesystem
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 at 10:02am, Gene Heskett wrote
> >Even More F..ing Data ?
>
> Are we allowed to chuckle here? From the nameing convention used,
> that would be the next logical progression. But now I wonder what
> the 4th lashup will be called if and when its needed? I hope you are
> pla
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 09:24, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jlb]$ df -h
>> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> *snip*
>> philip:/data 535G 396G 140G 74% /data
>> fluffy:/moredata 1.8T 1.3T 543G 71% /moredata
>> buckbe
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 at 3:24pm, Paul Bijnens wrote
> Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jlb]$ df -h
> > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > *snip*
> > philip:/data 535G 396G 140G 74% /data
> > fluffy:/moredata 1.8T 1.3T 543G 71% /moredata
>
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jlb]$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
*snip*
philip:/data 535G 396G 140G 74% /data
fluffy:/moredata 1.8T 1.3T 543G 71% /moredata
buckbeak:/emfd2.0T 1.2T 822G 60% /emfd
;) 3 guesses on what "emf
On Sat, 29 May 2004 at 2:07pm, Jon LaBadie wrote
> I think they are going to want to backup to disk, at least
> primarily. To that end they are willing to get an external
> usb drive (does RH 7.3 support that?) and when I suggested
I'm fairly certain it does. The kernel versions for 7.3, 8, and
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 02:07:22PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> I see gcc 2.96 is already installed as is a libreadline (don't
> hold me to it, but I think 4.3). Stupidly I forgot to check the
> tar version. Any thoughts on the compiler and readline versions?
I compiled Amanda with whatever was a
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 05:08:22PM -0700, John Bossert wrote:
> I'd suggest getting the DBA involved. If the database is running in
> ARCHIVEMODE, backing up the redo logfiles should be very doable, even
> with such a slow/small tapedrive. Depending, of course, on transaction
> volume. RMAN m
I'd suggest getting the DBA involved. If the database is running in
ARCHIVEMODE, backing up the redo logfiles should be very doable, even
with such a slow/small tapedrive. Depending, of course, on transaction
volume. RMAN may be useful (though I have no experience (yet) in
implementing it wi
On Saturday 29 May 2004 17:14, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> Until now I've never seen a 240GB file system :))
>
>Me neither, up to last week, when they called me for advice
>how to backup a 800 GB filesystem (4 x 200 GB SATA disks),
> containing one large Oracle database. The hardwar
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 11:14:26PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >Until now I've never seen a 240GB file system :))
>
> Me neither, up to last week, when they called me for advice
> how to backup a 800 GB filesystem (4 x 200 GB SATA disks), containing
> one large Oracle databas
Jon LaBadie wrote:
Until now I've never seen a 240GB file system :))
Me neither, up to last week, when they called me for advice
how to backup a 800 GB filesystem (4 x 200 GB SATA disks), containing
one large Oracle database. The hardware was completely configured
already, so was the database, so
Jon LaBadie wrote:
I see gcc 2.96 is already installed as is a libreadline (don't
hold me to it, but I think 4.3). Stupidly I forgot to check the
tar version. Any thoughts on the compiler and readline versions?
Might installing newer compiler and libs upset the vendor's app?
I must avoid that at
Hi, Jon,
on Samstag, 29. Mai 2004 at 20:07 you wrote to amanda-users:
JL> Until now I've never seen a 240GB file system :))
How do you feel about that ? ;-)
JL> Part of my concern is the age of the OS and the components.
JL> Don't suggest an OS upgrade, they use it for a very costly
JL> applica
A client has about 4 or 5 nearly identical HP workstations
(xeon's) running RH 7.3 linux. They are looking for a backup
solution and before I make any concrete recommendations I'd
like to ask a few questions.
Most of their disk space is SCSI, generally 36GB, but a
couple of larger ones, include o
19 matches
Mail list logo
