On Friday 30 December 2005 13:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 30 December 2005 10:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> >> Is this on the same machine, or on another client machine? In
>> >> the latter case, the connection may have timed
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 10:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> [...]
> >> Is this on the same machine, or on another client machine? In the
> >> latter case, the connection may have timed out during the failure
> >> recovery.
> >
> >Client and server are t
On Friday 30 December 2005 10:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[...]
>> Is this on the same machine, or on another client machine? In the
>> latter case, the connection may have timed out during the failure
>> recovery.
>
>Client and server are the same machine.
>
>> What are the dtimeout and etimeou
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 04:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005
On Friday 30 December 2005 04:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> >Is anyone e
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1?
> >> >
> >> >Recently I decre
On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1?
>> >
>> >Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to
>> >
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1?
> >
> >Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to 2.
> >On most days 1 vtape is sufficient. But every time Amanda hits
>
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1?
>
>Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to 2.
>On most days 1 vtape is sufficient. But every time Amanda hits
> (artificial as specified by tapetype) e
Hi all,
Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1?
Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to 2.
On most days 1 vtape is sufficient. But every time Amanda hits (artificial as
specified by tapetype) end of tape on a vtape and retries on the second tape,
she fails
10 matches
Mail list logo