Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 30 December 2005 13:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Friday 30 December 2005 10:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> [...] >> >> >> Is this on the same machine, or on another client machine? In >> >> the latter case, the connection may have timed

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-30 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 30 December 2005 10:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > [...] > >> Is this on the same machine, or on another client machine? In the > >> latter case, the connection may have timed out during the failure > >> recovery. > > > >Client and server are t

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 30 December 2005 10:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: [...] >> Is this on the same machine, or on another client machine? In the >> latter case, the connection may have timed out during the failure >> recovery. > >Client and server are the same machine. > >> What are the dtimeout and etimeou

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-30 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 30 December 2005 04:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 30 December 2005 04:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> >Is anyone e

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-30 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1? > >> > > >> >Recently I decre

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 29 December 2005 05:03, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1? >> > >> >Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to >> >

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1? > > > >Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to 2. > >On most days 1 vtape is sufficient. But every time Amanda hits >

Re: vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi all, > >Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1? > >Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to 2. >On most days 1 vtape is sufficient. But every time Amanda hits > (artificial as specified by tapetype) e

vtapes and runtapes > 1

2005-12-28 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi all, Is anyone else using vtapes with runtapes > 1? Recently I decreased tapelength and increased runtapes from 1 to 2. On most days 1 vtape is sufficient. But every time Amanda hits (artificial as specified by tapetype) end of tape on a vtape and retries on the second tape, she fails