* John R. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:05:47PM -0500)
Sure enough, GNU tar 1.13. Will version 1.11.8, or 1.12 work?
I don't think 1.11.* will work. 1.12 will work if you apply the patches
from www.amanda.org. 1.13.19 is reported to work.
Could this be added
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As in docs/INSTALL?
Ehm,
docs INSTALL sais, use 1.12 w/ patches.
I assumed (incorrectly) that 1.13 would work as well.
It's fixed in 2.4.2p1.
Will 1.13.17 work ?
Yep, but there's a (rare?) bug in 1.13.17 that may cause it
* Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:07:59AM -0200)
Ehm,
docs INSTALL sais, use 1.12 w/ patches.
I assumed (incorrectly) that 1.13 would work as well.
It's fixed in 2.4.2p1.
So I noticed ;)
Will 1.13.17 work ?
Yep, but there's a (rare?) bug in 1.13.17 that may
* John R. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 08:20:30PM -0500)
I have always wondered .. why does amanda pipe ufsdump output to ufsrestore
before sending it to the tape device?
It's collecting the index data.
The dump (or tar) output pipeline is rather complicated. The image
I saw that tar (gtar?) 1.13.19 is the right version to use. I checked
both the Free Software Foundations's site as well as rpmfind.net (just
in case my life would be easy.) and 1.13.17 seemed to be the latest.
Where should I be looking?
--
Josh Kuperman
[EMAIL
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
But you're comparing apples and oranges. As you've noted, going from
disk to tape on the same machine gets 3 MBytes/s whether you are using
ufsdump or Amanda is using taper to copy a holding disk image.
But that's not what happens when Amanda
Hi,
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
*** Error code 1
I seem to recal that it needs gnu make. Is this correct, and where can I
get a copy?
I am runing it on a freebsd
I am runing it on a freebsd 4.2-Release
On my openbsd box I see gmake in my ports tree here.
(bhyatt)@kawasaki:/usr/ports/devel/gmake:[115]
HTH
-Ben
Clem Kumah
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator / Teamleader
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:02:38 +
From: Clem Kumah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
*** Error code 1
I seem to recal that it needs gnu make. Is this
From: "Patrick M. Hausen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:49:46 +0100 (CET)
Doesn't installing Amanda from /usr/ports/misc/amanda24 work for you?
I started with amanda from "ports" back in '98, but it became rather too
awkward to ensure that the Solaris boxen also had amanda
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
Version 2.4.2p1 has been released and you should probably use it.
There is at least one fairly important bug fix.
Clem Kumah[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist,
On Jan 29, 2001, Jonathan Dill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know how to build binary RPMs optimized for other architecture
eg. i586 and i686? I think you have to do something to the spec file,
but I'm not sure what.
I think it's enough to build it with -march=i686 -mcpu=i686. I
believe
sidenote:
since egroups went yahoo, I haven';t eben able to access the searchable
archives ..
Is this just Konqueror, or is it broken ?
Anyway,
When dumping with ufsdump, amanda pipes through ufsrestore to get an index
.. fair enough
However, when dumping via tar, we dont need this, right ?
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being backed
up ?
The problem is that you wouldn't be able to tell error messages from
the actual file list. So we do throw a `tar tf' in the pipeline.
--
Alexandre
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
* Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:59:16PM -0200)
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being backed
up
On a recent backup report, we received the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
amanda sd0e lev 1 FAILED [nak error:unexpected ack packet]
amanda is the name of the backup server. I dump'ed the partition by hand,
and saw no problems. Anyone know what went wrong?
Thanks!
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:45:03PM
-0500)
It will require to much work to the sendbackup process. It
will be possible to do it with the DUMPER-API, is you have time, you
should work on the DUMPER-API.
Time,
yeah, heard about that ..
seems to be very
How does one configure the blocksize?
What about the blocksize used on the tape? perhaps that can be tuned, too...
g.
-Original Message-
From: Marc W. Mengel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 30 January 2001 3:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Grant Beattie; [EMAIL
Hello, I've been getting weird errors on my nightly amanda job and saw
that there was a problem.
I currently use an EXABYTE EZ 17 Autoloader drive and had used the
TAPETYPE value given from this email group. After a few weird errors and
thinking that I had fixed them, I finally fell short when
Can anyone help me diagnose what this error message precisely means?
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mars sda7 lev 3 FAILED [data timeout]
It means dumper on your server stopped getting data for 30 minutes
(or whatever you set dtimeout to in amanda.conf).
That, in turn, could be caused
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mars sda7 lev 3 FAILED [data timeout]
It means dumper on your server stopped getting data for 30 minutes (or
whatever you set dtimeout to in amanda.conf).
That's interesting, considering `mars' is the tape server.
Ben
Hi,
How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
Regards,
SMalla
__
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
Have you read docs/RESTORE? What about:
http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html
Both cover this topic.
SMalla
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben Hyatt wrote:
How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
use dd along with ufsrestore.
There's good online docs on this.
http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda-24.html
I've had a problem using dd with skip=1, though. For some reason, dd on
my system (Debian 2.2)
Suman Malla wrote:
While using dd with ufsrestore i.e.
dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k skip=1 | gzip -d | /usr/sbin/ufsrestore -ivh -
/dev/nst0 sounds like Linux but ufsrestore sounds like Solaris. Are you
trying to read from the right device?
25 matches
Mail list logo
