On Fri 06 Sep 02 16:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
level 0 and degraded mode? Aren't these non-sequitors? I thought degraded
mode meant falling back to incrementals because there was no place to put
the level 0's. I.e. the tape was not working and the holding disk did not
have enough unreserved
On Sunday 08 September 2002 05:53, Brian Jonnes wrote:
On Fri 06 Sep 02 16:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
level 0 and degraded mode? Aren't these non-sequitors? I
thought degraded mode meant falling back to incrementals because
there was no place to put the level 0's. I.e. the tape was not
working
Merhaba daha once sizinle bir kanalda gorusmustuk bu mail aracaligi ile tanismamiz mumkun mu acaba ?
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 08:45:59PM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
amanda-2.4.2p2 and 2.4.3b4 are compatible.
That's good to know - at least I won't have to upgrade amanda on all the
clients.
You must know that the file: driver is limited by the maximum file size
of your filesystem.
I
On Sun 08 Sep 02 15:34, Gene Heskett wrote:
Then, if you are sure the kernels ide-scsi support is working, I'm
of the opinion that this drive should be taken to a winderz box,
and the software on the cd that came with it be used to verify that
it is indeed working. I've had quite a bit of
On Sunday 08 September 2002 11:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Brian Jonnes wrote:
On Fri 06 Sep 02 16:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
level 0 and degraded mode? Aren't these non-sequitors? I
thought degraded mode meant falling back to incrementals
because there
On Sunday 08 September 2002 15:23, Brian Jonnes wrote:
On Sun 08 Sep 02 15:34, Gene Heskett wrote:
Then, if you are sure the kernels ide-scsi support is working,
I'm of the opinion that this drive should be taken to a winderz
box, and the software on the cd that came with it be used to
verify
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:59:03PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote:
I'm not using a holding disk at all - it doesn't seem to make sense when
using the file: device. Perhaps I'm wrong there ? I don't know enough bout
amanda's architecture. Perhaps it is a good idea to use a holding disk, even
with
Hi Adnan,
Try this patch, tell me it works.
Jean-Louis
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:26:56PM -0700, Adnan Olia wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question. Can you run amverify on a tapeless
backup in
Amanda. I have no tape drives or tape changes and I
am backing up
my machines completely on my
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 08 September 2002 11:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
The second part of my question was what percentage is reserved?
The default is 100%. I.e. 100% reserved for incrementals,
therefore none of those 26GB for level 0's and thus
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:40:54AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 08 September 2002 11:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
The second part of my question was what percentage is reserved?
The default is 100%. I.e. 100% reserved for
11 matches
Mail list logo
