Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
This does *not* appear to be Gene's problem of several days ago. Yesterday, I reconfigured some disk, and reconfigured amanda to work with the disk changes. For nearly one year, I have used the following as a top level dumptype, from which all others inherit: define dumptype global {

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:28:10:28:28-0500] scribed: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:07:34AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / Now, since this addition, I get this: # sudo -u backup amcheck DailySet1 -cltw Amanda Tape Server Host Check

amcheck privileges (Was Re: Can't open exclude file ???)

2004-01-28 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:28:28 -0500 Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC, amcheck does not run with the same root permissions as amdump. Thus it may not be able to get to the excluce file during an amcheck. From my experience this is indeed true. This makes the amcheck

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Hi, Amanda will always give an error if it can't access the exclude file unless it's a ENOENT (no such file) with the optional option. It's a configuration mistake, you told amanda to use a file and it can't check if the file exist. first solution: Change your DLE for this disk to remove the

Upgrade

2004-01-28 Thread Bert_De_Ridder
Hi all, I have an installation where Amanda has been built by me (remember those annoying questions 'How do I execute scripts from within Amanda' last year ? ;-) ) I would like to upgrade to 2.4.4; is there anything I should keep in mind ? (I still have my 'original' config statement

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: * Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:28:10:28:28-0500] scribed: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:07:34AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / Now, since this addition, I get this: # sudo -u backup amcheck

Re: amcheck privileges (Was Re: Can't open exclude file ???)

2004-01-28 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
selfcheck, sendsize and sendbackup are run on client as the amanda user. They have the same permission. It's only the backup program that is sometime run as root. Jean-Louis On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:04:26AM -0600, Frank Smith wrote: --On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:28:28 -0500 Jon

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:28:11:08:19-0500] scribed: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / Ironically, I do _not_ need any exclude file for this DLE. Initially, I did not have any exclude file, and amcheck issued the _same_ error. Then, I

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:39:20AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: * Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:28:11:08:19-0500] scribed: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / # ls -adl /usr/local/home/mds/mail drwxr-xr-x 19 mds mds

Kerberos 5 support?

2004-01-28 Thread pll+amanda
Is this being worked on and likely to happen anytime in the reasonably near future? I really don't want to punch holes in my firewall if I don't have to :) Thanks, -- Seeya, Paul GPG Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE If you're not having fun,

Re: Ramifications of dump cycle and number of tapes choices

2004-01-28 Thread Georg Rehfeld
Hi, though the question is fairly old I found the answer just now: Gene Heskett wrote: I've got a silly Q myself over this one, and the man page is no help for this. But what does it mean when out in the future tense columns, one gets an 01 or a 10 or a 1E. Samples from the rather lengthy

ERROR: u07: [access as amanda not allowed from amanda@u03] amandahostsauth failed

2004-01-28 Thread Eugen Leitl
I'm trying to backup the machine u07 from u07 (the one with the tape drive). I'm getting a ash-2.00$ amcheck daily Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /Disk2/AMANDA: 3376999 KB disk space available, that's plenty ERROR: cannot overwrite active tape

Re: Kerberos 5 support?

2004-01-28 Thread Greg Troxel
it should be conceptually fairly easy to add krb5 (hopefully gssapi, actually) code to parallel the krb4 support. the hard part is that there can be more than one enctype, but we could force 3des. gsswrap will be unusable due to the err interesting scheme the krb4 stuff uses. -- Greg

Re: Ramifications of dump cycle and number of tapes choices

2004-01-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 16:22, Georg Rehfeld wrote: Hi, Thanks Georg. Someone else had explained it to me also, but this a actually a bit clearer an explanation, thanks. though the question is fairly old I found the answer just now: Gene Heskett wrote: I've got a silly Q myself over this

Re: ERROR: u07: [access as amanda not allowed from amanda@u03] amandahostsauth failed

2004-01-28 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 13:52:10 +0100 Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to backup the machine u07 from u07 (the one with the tape drive). I'm getting a ash-2.00$ amcheck daily Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /Disk2/AMANDA: