On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:23:10PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
I think that's what's happening, a dump with est_kps larger than the
bandwidth will never be scheduled to dump on holding disk.
I agree it looks like that could happen in principle (in fact, I wonder
if other such "don't do
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 09:35:54AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:23:10PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
I think that's what's happening, a dump with est_kps larger than the
bandwidth will never be scheduled to dump on holding disk.
I agree it looks like
claiming there was [no more holding disk space] -
What do you think went wrong?
Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d20 11560144 1847220 959732317%/dump
Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR November 3, 2000
*** THE DUMPS DID NOT
From: "Denise Ives" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
claiming there was [no more holding disk space] -
What do you think went wrong?
Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d20 11560144 1847220 959732317%/dump
Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR
Here is my amanda.conf file with respect to the holding disk -
holdingdisk hd1 {
comment "main holding disk"
directory "/dump/amanda"# where the holding disk is
use -500Mb # how much space can we use on it
# a negative value mean:
Here is my amanda.conf file with respect to the holding disk -
...
use -500Mb ...
That's OK.
chunksize -1 ...
This is not related to your problem, but you should change this at
some point to something like "1000 Mb".
Is the use wrong?
It might be a little large (why not let Amanda
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, John R. Jackson wrote:
Here is my amanda.conf file with respect to the holding disk -
...
use -500Mb ...
That's OK.
chunksize -1 ...
This is not related to your problem, but you should change this at
some point to something like "1000 Mb".
Is the use
I think that's what's happening, a dump with est_kps larger than the
bandwidth will never be scheduled to dump on holding disk.
I agree it looks like that could happen in principle (in fact, I wonder
if other such "don't do this now" states should be examined), but in this
particular case the
