Re: NO_AMANDA (was Re: RAIT in 2.4.3b4)

2003-01-30 Thread Marc W. Mengel
one more thing I'm curious about: is the backwards C idiom if (0 != sometestfunc()) instead of the usual if (sometestfunc() != 0) preferred by amanda developers, or Mr. Mengel? It's very strange to read, I've never seen it before :) Well, I can't speak for the other developers

Re: NO_AMANDA (was Re: RAIT in 2.4.3b4)

2003-01-28 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:48:06PM -0500, Scott Mcdermott wrote: John R. Jackson on Mon 27/01 21:37 -0500: - the #ifdef NO_AMANDA stuff is pretty much exact duplication. Anyone consider just moving this out into a library instead of duplicating whole routines in rait-*.c ?

NO_AMANDA (was Re: RAIT in 2.4.3b4)

2003-01-27 Thread Scott Mcdermott
John R. Jackson on Mon 27/01 21:37 -0500: - the #ifdef NO_AMANDA stuff is pretty much exact duplication. Anyone consider just moving this out into a library instead of duplicating whole routines in rait-*.c ? Yes, but Marc Mengel really (really :-) wanted to keep the code