At Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:03:23 -0600 Rhys Rhaven r...@rhavenindustrys.com wrote:
Looks like the bug that I posted, which I believe Jean-Louis sent the
patch for. I've been unable to test it as of yet.
I compared my logs with your logs and it is much the same.
I cannot find the patch you
I attach the patch that was committed.
Jean-Louis
Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:03:23 -0600 Rhys Rhaven r...@rhavenindustrys.com wrote:
Looks like the bug that I posted, which I believe Jean-Louis sent the
patch for. I've been unable to test it as of yet.
I compared
Using /var/log/amanda/60villagedrive/amdump.1
From Mon Nov 15 00:10:02 EST 2010
bach:/ 183m finished (0:17:59)
haydn:/ 147m finished (0:20:35)
ravel:/ 189m finished (0:20:36)
ravel:/mnt/RAID0 1 816m failed: process terminated while waiting
Because ravel:/mnt/RAID0 was not dumped.
Check the email report to know why or the client debug file (on ravel)
Jean-Louis
Robert Heller wrote:
Using /var/log/amanda/60villagedrive/amdump.1
From Mon Nov 15 00:10:02 EST 2010
bach:/ 183m finished (0:17:59)
haydn:/ 1
At Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:34:31 -0500 Jean-Louis Martineau martin...@zmanda.com
wrote:
Because ravel:/mnt/RAID0 was not dumped.
Check the email report to know why or the client debug file (on ravel)
The E-Mail report just says:
FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
ravel /mnt/RAID0 RESULTS MISSING
ravel
Looks like the bug that I posted, which I believe Jean-Louis sent the
patch for. I've been unable to test it as of yet.
On 11/15/2010 04:11 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:34:31 -0500 Jean-Louis Martineaumartin...@zmanda.com
wrote:
Because ravel:/mnt/RAID0 was not
