Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:37:21PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JMC" == Jose M Calhariz writes: > > JMC> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for > JMC> the Debian package. > > Amanda in Fedora has been socket-activated

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

> "JMC" == Jose M Calhariz writes: JMC> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for JMC> the Debian package. Amanda in Fedora has been socket-activated for years. Feel free to grab the relevant units from our git tree:

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:18:22PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31 > CEST): > … > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > > Debian package. > > Here are the unit files, I created

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

> > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31 > > CEST): > > … > > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > > > Debian package. > > > > Here are the unit files, I created just now. > > The User= setting needs to be adapted

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:32:25PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Lorenzo Marcantonio (Mo 10 Jul 2017 13:23:36 CEST): > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > > > (stretch).

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

Lorenzo Marcantonio (Mo 10 Jul 2017 13:23:36 CEST): > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, > > and if it

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31 CEST): … > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > Debian package. Here are the unit files, I created just now. The User= setting needs to be adapted probably.

Re: Amvault for the Compleat Dummy

Am 2017-06-16 um 00:28 schrieb Charles Curley: > I get the distinct impression I should do some setup before I can use > amvault. However, none of the documentation I've found so far indicates > what I should do to get set up. same here, same here. Does anyone understand and use that? ;-)

Re: Amvault for the Compleat Dummy

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:37:42PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 2017-06-16 um 00:28 schrieb Charles Curley: > > I get the distinct impression I should do some setup before I can use > > amvault. However, none of the documentation I've found so far indicates > > what I should do to get

Debian: inetd required for amanda?

It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked. -- The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, > and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked. > Maybe I should change that and make inetd

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, > and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked. Amanda needs some kind of way to be