Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 22:28:56 CEST): > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 15:27:47 CEST): > > > > > BTW the dash after ENVIRONMENT_FILE= is a typo? > > > Or some systemd syntax. > > > >

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 15:27:47 CEST): > > > BTW the dash after ENVIRONMENT_FILE= is a typo? > > Or some systemd syntax. > > No, in is just a "conditional", if the file does not exist, it is not >

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 15:27:47 CEST): > > No, it just redirects the STDERR (if there is any) to > > the journal, and not to the client. Or needs amandad to send (stderr) > > output to the client? > > > Without investigation I assumed the log/debug files were written >

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:40:36AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 07:56:28 CEST): > > > > > > | StandardInput=socket > > > > > | StandardError=journal > > > > Does this prevent writing to amanda's normal log/debug files? > > No, it just

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 07:56:28 CEST): > > > Added "After=local-fs.target". Debian may not even have > > > the "local-fs.target", or they may have something similar. > > > > Do the "After=" dependencies matter for socket activated services? > I don't know. Why do you

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
as a reference 2 units I run with gentoo linux (suggested them to the maintainers there, is now part of gentoo): # cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/amanda.socket [Unit] Description=Amanda Socket [Socket] ListenStream=10080 Accept=true [Install] WantedBy=sockets.target # cat

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 > > > 19:51:31 CEST): > > > … > > > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > > > > Debian package. > > > > > > Here are

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
> > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31 > > CEST): > > … > > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > > > Debian package. > > > > Here are the unit files, I created just now. > > The User= setting needs to be adapted

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:18:22PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31 > CEST): > … > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > > Debian package. > > Here are the unit files, I created

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31 CEST): … > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the > Debian package. Here are the unit files, I created just now. The User= setting needs to be adapted probably.

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:37:21PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JMC" == Jose M Calhariz writes: > > JMC> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for > JMC> the Debian package. > > Amanda in Fedora has been socket-activated

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JMC" == Jose M Calhariz writes: JMC> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for JMC> the Debian package. Amanda in Fedora has been socket-activated for years. Feel free to grab the relevant units from our git tree:

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:32:25PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Lorenzo Marcantonio (Mo 10 Jul 2017 13:23:36 CEST): > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > > > (stretch).

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Lorenzo Marcantonio (Mo 10 Jul 2017 13:23:36 CEST): > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, > > and if it

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, > and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked. Amanda needs some kind of way to be

Re: Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, > and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked. > Maybe I should change that and make inetd

Debian: inetd required for amanda?

2017-07-10 Thread Charles Curley
It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9 (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it, and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked. -- The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable