Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 22:28:56 CEST):
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 15:27:47 CEST):
> >
> > > BTW the dash after ENVIRONMENT_FILE= is a typo?
> > > Or some systemd syntax.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:36:48PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 15:27:47 CEST):
>
> > BTW the dash after ENVIRONMENT_FILE= is a typo?
> > Or some systemd syntax.
>
> No, in is just a "conditional", if the file does not exist, it is not
>
Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 15:27:47 CEST):
> > No, it just redirects the STDERR (if there is any) to
> > the journal, and not to the client. Or needs amandad to send (stderr)
> > output to the client?
> >
> Without investigation I assumed the log/debug files were written
>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:40:36AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 07:56:28 CEST):
>
> > > > > | StandardInput=socket
> > > > > | StandardError=journal
> >
> > Does this prevent writing to amanda's normal log/debug files?
>
> No, it just
Jon LaBadie (Di 11 Jul 2017 07:56:28 CEST):
> > > Added "After=local-fs.target". Debian may not even have
> > > the "local-fs.target", or they may have something similar.
> >
> > Do the "After=" dependencies matter for socket activated services?
> I don't know. Why do you
as a reference 2 units I run with gentoo linux (suggested them to the
maintainers there, is now part of gentoo):
# cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/amanda.socket
[Unit]
Description=Amanda Socket
[Socket]
ListenStream=10080
Accept=true
[Install]
WantedBy=sockets.target
# cat
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017
> > > 19:51:31 CEST):
> > > …
> > > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the
> > > > Debian package.
> > >
> > > Here are
> > Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31
> > CEST):
> > …
> > > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the
> > > Debian package.
> >
> > Here are the unit files, I created just now.
> > The User= setting needs to be adapted
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:18:22PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31
> CEST):
> …
> > I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the
> > Debian package.
>
> Here are the unit files, I created
Jose M Calhariz (Mo 10 Jul 2017 19:51:31
CEST):
…
> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for the
> Debian package.
Here are the unit files, I created just now.
The User= setting needs to be adapted probably.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:37:21PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JMC" == Jose M Calhariz writes:
>
> JMC> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for
> JMC> the Debian package.
>
> Amanda in Fedora has been socket-activated
> "JMC" == Jose M Calhariz writes:
JMC> I happily ship a systemd unit for amanda if someone writes one for
JMC> the Debian package.
Amanda in Fedora has been socket-activated for years. Feel free to grab
the relevant units from our git tree:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:32:25PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Lorenzo Marcantonio (Mo 10 Jul 2017 13:23:36 CEST):
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9
> > > (stretch).
Lorenzo Marcantonio (Mo 10 Jul 2017 13:23:36 CEST):
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9
> > (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it,
> > and if it
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9
> (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it,
> and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked.
Amanda needs some kind of way to be
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:30:34AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9
> (stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it,
> and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked.
>
Maybe I should change that and make inetd
It seems that inetd is required for amanda 1:3.3.9-5 on Debian 9
(stretch). In the days of SSH, is this necessary? I have no use for it,
and if it isn't installed it can't be cracked.
--
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable
17 matches
Mail list logo