Re: Request for interested reviewers ...
Am 16.05.22 um 10:01 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 13.05.22 um 18:12 schrieb Chris Hassell: ANNOUNCEMENT: I'm going to try to push Betsol's attempt at a 3.6 "community build" into a 3_6 branch, so it can be tested as a whole. We will serve binaries built for many distros as we can get them together. There's enough changes to merit a reasonably new sub-version, if not maybe the 4.0 we would like. My version of amsamba upgrade is in: 3_5-out-amsamba-only Thanks for sharing. Tested your new amsamba-script right now, still that "missing size line from sendbackup". In general: is the dump OK then anyway, or not? Or: can we ignore that message for now or not? As far as I test recovery the dumps seem OK, but I would prefer a definitive statement here ... I assume the newer amsamba-script should fix that as soon as it works with recent samba-versions.
Re: Request for interested reviewers ...
Am 13.05.22 um 18:12 schrieb Chris Hassell: ANNOUNCEMENT: I'm going to try to push Betsol's attempt at a 3.6 "community build" into a 3_6 branch, so it can be tested as a whole. We will serve binaries built for many distros as we can get them together. There's enough changes to merit a reasonably new sub-version, if not maybe the 4.0 we would like. My version of amsamba upgrade is in: 3_5-out-amsamba-only Thanks for sharing. Tested your new amsamba-script right now, still that "missing size line from sendbackup". I only substituted that one script on my debian 11.3 system and edited some paths to make it work (@amdatadir@, for example).
RE: Request for interested reviewers ...
ANNOUNCEMENT: I'm going to try to push Betsol's attempt at a 3.6 "community build" into a 3_6 branch, so it can be tested as a whole. We will serve binaries built for many distros as we can get them together. There's enough changes to merit a reasonably new sub-version, if not maybe the 4.0 we would like. My version of amsamba upgrade is in: 3_5-out-amsamba-only Other branches I'd like review on: 3_5-out-amcryptsimple-fix 3_5-out-perl-build-changes 3_5-packaging-upgrade-wip 3_5-upgrade-gnulib - the gnulib upgrade may be a bit older than the latest gnulib, but it seems a good idea anyway]. - the perl-build changes - the packaging-upgrade-wip branch finally builds correctly for Debian, RPM and a new one: "tar". - the packaging-upgrade-wip also creates a 'test' build too (for RPM only currently) that includes all the installcheck tests in an independent location [For a "tar" build the make install tree are placed in a "BUILD" subdirectory in a manner similar to Debian but obviously without creating any package. This may make Arch or others more easily adapted if anyone was curious as to try.] > -Original Message- > From: Stefan G. Weichinger > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 1:37 AM > To: Chris Hassell ; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Request for interested reviewers ... > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of BETSOL. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Am 02.12.20 um 01:17 schrieb Chris Hassell: > > Greetings, > > > > It’s been a long spring and summer. At BETSOL we’re (sigh) very nearly > > done with our new Django-based UI for Zmanda 4.0 based on Amanda > > 3.5.1. Along with that, we have several updates that need review and > > we’d like to get in to the community version we support. Hopefully > > enough to call it 3.6? > > [..] > > > -Updates to Amsamba.pl > > > > oBig work simply to update, clean up, and eliminate troublesome warnings. > > > > oUse of “-A” authorization ‘file’ to communicate to smbclient (as > > PASSWD_FD caused problems often) > > > > oConsistent use of open3 for checks / backups / restores > > I'd be happy to test new amsamba, as mentioned in another thread and on > github. Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re-transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
Re: Request for interested reviewers ...
Am 02.12.20 um 01:17 schrieb Chris Hassell: Greetings, It’s been a long spring and summer. At BETSOL we’re (sigh) very nearly done with our new Django-based UI for Zmanda 4.0 based on Amanda 3.5.1. Along with that, we have several updates that need review and we’d like to get in to the community version we support. Hopefully enough to call it 3.6? [..] -Updates to Amsamba.pl oBig work simply to update, clean up, and eliminate troublesome warnings. oUse of “-A” authorization ‘file’ to communicate to smbclient (as PASSWD_FD caused problems often) oConsistent use of open3 for checks / backups / restores I'd be happy to test new amsamba, as mentioned in another thread and on github.
Re: Request for interested reviewers ...
Am 02.12.20 um 01:17 schrieb Chris Hassell: Greetings, It’s been a long spring and summer. At BETSOL we’re (sigh) very nearly done with our new Django-based UI for Zmanda 4.0 based on Amanda 3.5.1. Along with that, we have several updates that need review and we’d like to get in to the community version we support. Hopefully enough to call it 3.6? I don't see any replies to this in the mailing list. Correct? What exactly do you ask for here? Why don't you provide access via the amanda github repository, as it is usual for open source projects? The amanda-users here wait for several bugs to be fixed, so we are looking forward to you closing some of the long waiting issues ;-) Please communicate with the community in a more responsive way. best wishes, Stefan
Request for interested reviewers ...
Greetings, It’s been a long spring and summer. At BETSOL we’re (sigh) very nearly done with our new Django-based UI for Zmanda 4.0 based on Amanda 3.5.1. Along with that, we have several updates that need review and we’d like to get in to the community version we support. Hopefully enough to call it 3.6? -Still need to consistently update the build (old stuff) o Hasn’t been reviewed but it’s also been changing for us all through the summer. -Large updates to NDMP (in ndmp-src) o Using dynamic memory for lists and data structures so protocol messages are not limited in numbers. o A better KEEPALIVE protocol setting so very large transfers don’t time out the control/info TCP sessions. o Explicit use of the common-src tcp ports so firewalled ports are correctly picked from “low/root” or “h/non-root” port lists. -Updates to Amsamba.pl o Big work simply to update, clean up, and eliminate troublesome warnings. o Use of “-A” authorization ‘file’ to communicate to smbclient (as PASSWD_FD caused problems often) o Consistent use of open3 for checks / backups / restores -Upcoming work in server-src o To prevent oversized shared-memory buffers for S3 (512MB?!?!) o More consistent use of a ring buffer in several places. Thanks in advance. n Christopher Hassell, BETSOL Inc. Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re-transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
