On 27. 12. 2011 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > We did not release a broken tarball at all. Just because your > definitions are not up-to-date doesn't mean it is Amarok's fault.
This is not entirely true, Myriam. The definitions are part of kdelibs and we claim to support kdelibs 4.6, so we in fact released a partially broken tarball. The thing is that handbook translations were AFAIK added only to the final tarball (not the beta) and as Bart said, no Amarok developer uses obsolete kdelibs, so it slipped through. Modestas, you warned us about this problem, thank you for that, we would normally re-spin the tarball, but Amarok 2.5 was already very delayed and we wanted to make it before Christmas, so we decided to release a tarball that is broken is some special cases, with patches (thanks to you) available in the amarok mailing list. I hope this little explanation helps not to discourage you from packaging Amarok for Debian. Regards, Matěj Laitl _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel