Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2012-01-03 Thread Sven Krohlas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heya, has that patch already been committed to master? It should be part of 2.5.1. - -- Darkerradio Free Music Charts November 2011: http://www.darkerradio.com/news/free-music-charts-november-2011/ Klarmachen zum Ändern! -

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2012-01-03 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 3. 1. 2012 Sven Krohlas wrote: Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details Heya, has that patch already been committed to master? It should be part of 2.5.1. Sven, doc/nl/index.docbook is not a part of amarok master, it is added to amarok releases by release

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2012-01-03 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On antradienis 03 Sausis 2012 17:58:10 Matěj Laitl wrote: On 3. 1. 2012 Sven Krohlas wrote: Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details Heya, has that patch already been committed to master? It should be part of 2.5.1. Sven, doc/nl/index.docbook is not

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2011-12-29 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 27. 12. 2011 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: We did not release a broken tarball at all. Just because your definitions are not up-to-date doesn't mean it is Amarok's fault. This is not entirely true, Myriam. The definitions are part of kdelibs and we claim to support kdelibs 4.6, so we in fact

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2011-12-28 Thread Bart Cerneels
This problem sneaked in through auto-generated translations at release time. Most developers are running very recent kdelibs versions (latest stable or even git) and we don't have an automated build testing system to catch these. We do rely on packagers to notify us of problems in their specific

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2011-12-26 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On šeštadienis 17 Gruodis 2011 23:33:18 Matěj Laitl wrote: On 17. 12. 2011 Modestas Vainius wrote: current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could be related to kdelibs 4.6.5): cd ../doc/nl /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check --cache /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2011-12-17 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On šeštadienis 17 Gruodis 2011 21:12:02 Bart Cerneels wrote: I'm testing the tarball myself ATM. What CMake options did you use to build? Nothing fancy: -DCMAKE_USE_RELATIVE_PATHS=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debian -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -- Modestas

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2011-12-17 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 17. 12. 2011 Modestas Vainius wrote: current 2.5.0 tarball does not build. The problem is in the doc/nl (could be related to kdelibs 4.6.5): cd ../doc/nl /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check --cache /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64- linux-gnu/doc/nl/index.cache.bz2 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/doc/nl/index.docbook

Re: 2.5.0 tarball problems

2011-12-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 17 de desembre de 2011, a les 20:12:02, Bart Cerneels va escriure: I'm testing the tarball myself ATM. What CMake options did you use to build? i18n people: I have no clue about the translation stuff. Thom.Castermans entity was added to kdelibs on Wed Oct 12 this means nl