Re: Soft/hard dependency requirements post 2.8 - input, please

2013-07-29 Thread Edward Toroshchin
What's the point in that? Everyone who merges their project can just add the dependencies to the README and that's it. (by can I mean must, naturally) -- Edward Hades Toroshchin dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org ___ Amarok-devel mailing list

Re: Soft/hard dependency requirements post 2.8 - input, please

2013-07-29 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 29. 7. 2013 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: with the GSoC projects we discovered a few dependency requirements that will be necessary. libcdio 0.90 This is usually fine, the distros package the libraries *for us* (applications), not for themselves, so if we declare the dependency in advance

Re: Soft/hard dependency requirements post 2.8 - input, please

2013-07-29 Thread 0inkane
Hi, as apackager (Chakra) who's subscribed to this mailing list I guess I can help answering your question: libcdio is unfortunately not ABI compatible (I guess you're interested in ABI, not API), see http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libcdio.html . I can't tell you what other

Re: Soft/hard dependency requirements post 2.8 - input, please

2013-07-29 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 29. 7. 2013 0inkane wrote: Hi, as apackager (Chakra) who's subscribed to this mailing list I guess I can help answering your question: libcdio is unfortunately not ABI compatible (I guess you're interested in ABI, not API) Actually not, I assumed ABI incompatibility. What matters here