On March 22, 2012, 10:04 p.m., Lucas Gomes wrote:
Could you please explain what are the benefits (direct, current - not
hypothetical or philosofical) of the TreeItem - NormalTreeItem,
MergedTreeItem split? Where exactly is avoids code duplication?
Ok, first ignore revision five. In it
On March 22, 2012, 10:04 p.m., Lucas Gomes wrote:
Could you please explain what are the benefits (direct, current - not
hypothetical or philosofical) of the TreeItem - NormalTreeItem,
MergedTreeItem split? Where exactly is avoids code duplication?
Lucas Gomes wrote:
Ok, first
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/#review14180
---
This is outstanding since quite some time.
I liked it somehow.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/#review11771
---
src/browsers/AbstractTreeViewDelegate.h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/#review10222
---
The screenshots look good. Perhaps some font effects (italics,
On Jan. 30, 2012, 8:17 a.m., Bart Cerneels wrote:
The screenshots look good. Perhaps some font effects (italics, bold) can be
added to highlight channels with new episodes to make it even more
intuitive?
Have not take a better look at the code yet. My remark on an early version
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/
---
(Updated Jan. 27, 2012, 1:11 a.m.)
Review request for Amarok and Bart
On 18. 1. 2012 Lucas Lira Gomes wrote:
Hi everyone,
Does anybody else but Myriam doesn't liked the extra info on the
CollectionBrowser? If you haven't opined yet please let us know what's your
opinion and explain why you prefer one way or another.
I agree with Myriam. Track count is useful
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/#review9902
---
I am not a kde developer, but to me it looks like the items on
Hi,
So, please help me to improve this feature even more by answering some
questions:
1) Should I show the quantity of tracks on playlists listed in
PlaylistBrowser too?
2) Is there any extra information that you think it's relevant to be showed
somewhere (In QTreeViews)?
I really
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:56, Lorenz Röhrl sheeps...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
So, please help me to improve this feature even more by answering some
questions:
1) Should I show the quantity of tracks on playlists listed in
PlaylistBrowser too?
2) Is there any extra information that you think
Hi everyone,
Does anybody else but Myriam doesn't liked the extra info on the
CollectionBrowser? If you haven't opined yet please let us know what's your
opinion and explain why you prefer one way or another.
Maybe Myriam is right, but this feature could be possibly like the album art.
You
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/#review9846
---
Some problems with plural localization.
Apart from that the fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/
---
(Updated Jan. 4, 2012, 12:52 a.m.)
Review request for Amarok and Bart
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/
---
Review request for Amarok and Bart Cerneels.
Description
---
This is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/
---
(Updated Jan. 2, 2012, 1:29 a.m.)
Review request for Amarok and Bart
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/#review9423
---
Lucas, thanks for your review request. This is a rather bigger
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103603/
---
(Updated Jan. 2, 2012, 2:38 p.m.)
Review request for Amarok and Bart
18 matches
Mail list logo
