On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all,
Hi all,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz wrote:
On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
Amarok with tests on
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Konrad Zemek konrad.ze...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
2014-12-14 13:02 GMT+01:00 Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org:
Hi all,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz wrote:
On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
gmock sources are
Hi all,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz wrote:
On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still use a cmake-gui
based approach where I manually set
Hey,
2014-12-14 13:02 GMT+01:00 Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org:
Hi all,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz wrote:
On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
Amarok with tests on is still
On 14. 12. 2014 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
Can we please make a release soon, Matěj?
That's what I wanted to do for ages, but having a full-time job and furnishing
a flat takes more time than I've ever expected. :-|
I still plan want to do it, but if someone is faster than me (Ralf?
On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
Git submodule approach looks promising, however I have some concerns:
a) this makes test depend on 'your' github repositories; we cannot
guarantee they won't go away etc.
b) this makes testing Amarok require internet connection, at least
initially;
2014-12-14 13:38 GMT+01:00 Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz:
On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
Git submodule approach looks promising, however I have some concerns:
a) this makes test depend on 'your' github repositories; we cannot
guarantee they won't go away etc.
b) this makes testing
On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
Matěj Laitl wrote:
How big is tarballed gtest + gmock? Can we just embed them in our release
tarballs? Else we can create something like
amarok-testlibs-$version.tar.bz2, but that would be more work and effort.
tarred and bzipped, the repos take 588KB
2014-12-14 16:07 GMT+01:00 Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz:
On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
Matěj Laitl wrote:
How big is tarballed gtest + gmock? Can we just embed them in our release
tarballs? Else we can create something like
amarok-testlibs-$version.tar.bz2, but that would be more work
Hi Matěj,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Matěj Laitl ma...@laitl.cz wrote:
On 14. 12. 2014 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
Can we please make a release soon, Matěj?
That's what I wanted to do for ages, but having a full-time job and
furnishing
a flat takes more time than I've ever
Hey everyone,
gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still use a cmake-gui
based approach where I manually set paths to my pre-compiled gmock
lib, as I outlined in an email some months ago).
I solved the problem through
On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still use a cmake-gui
based approach where I manually set paths to my pre-compiled gmock
lib, as I outlined in an email some months ago).
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
