Re: [AMaViS-user] UNCHECKED vs BypassVirusChecks

2009-04-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, April 7, 2009 19:20, Mark Martinec wrote: However, if users HAVE asked for Virus checking, and Amavisd is unable to check the attachment, then it SHOULD modify the Subject to UNCHECKED. Your suggestion makes sense, I'll make the change with 2.6.3, thanks! how does mailzu see this if

Re: [AMaViS-user] poor phisher has nimda?

2009-04-11 Thread Michael Scheidell
SPF_PASS ? Gee, did you even READ what I wrote? How is spf_pass going to stop emails with: /html html (new html section after the /html close?) Guess I am just stupid and don't understand what spf has to do with malformed html. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO |SECNAP Network Security