Cory,
Thanks everyone, a couple of nice scripts
Will also look at mounting that dir in RAM, should improve performance, my
server only has 1 x 2.5inch disk so not exactly the fastest but I have a
fair bit of RAM to spare
Unless you really need to shave off the few milliseconds, I'd suggest
Xueron Nee,
I have just got a problem about a message with multi recipients.
the message has 18 recipients, and amavisd-new forwards it to my dspam
using pipeline. But the first recipient got a negative SMTP response to
data-dot, and which caused the message be delivered again and again.
Hello
Click on the link below and please enter your birthday for me. It will take
less than one minute.
http://www.birthdayalarm.com/bd2/83679057a515891243b1478332981c716664763d1386
Thank You,
Udayagiri
--
Let
On ons 02 sep 2009 13:23:15 CEST, Udayagiri Krishna Chaithanya wrote
Click on the link below and please enter your birthday for me. It
will take less than one minute.
is it a joke you forgot to share your own birthday ?
--
xpoint
Hi Mark!
Mark Martinec wrote:
Unless you really need to shave off the few milliseconds, I'd suggest
NOT to move temp directory to a ram disk, which is typically much
smaller than a real disk partition, so can fill up much faster and
block mail flow if something unpredictable happens.
Thomas,
Regarding the few milliseconds - are you sure that we are talking
abust just a few of them? Time ago I dedicated 1 GB tmpfs to each
Amavis Host, and it seemed that this really improved I/O performance.
However, I did not run any benchmarks proving this.
It very much depends on the
Thank you very much!
That was a huge message/partial message, and I think that was the root of
the problem. :)
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:52:05 +0200 Mark Martinec mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si
wrote:
I'd say 17 minutes is way too long, and you should investigate why
DSPAM is taking so long. I
