[AMaViS-user] Per user prefs

2011-02-23 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
Hi folks, I've a question about user preferences. What if a mail has multiple addressees? If they use different settings is it possible that some of them receives a potential spam while others do not? How tagging does work in this case? Each recipients get a different header with its own scores?

Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple postfix servers using a single amavis server

2010-11-16 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Noel Jones wrote: On 11/16/2010 12:17 PM, Matias Banchoff wrote: Hello, I have a question regarding the $forward_method variable. I have two postfix servers and only one amavis server installed. Is it possible to have amavis check mails from both postfix

Re: [AMaViS-user] AMaViS as before-queue content filter to Postfix?

2010-06-29 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS as a before-queue content filter -- rejecting messages scoring above 25 (or maybe 30), accepting (and quarantining) messages scoring between 5 and 25 (or 30), and delivering mail scoring below 5. I guess before queue filtering and quarantine

[AMaViS-user] spamassassin + user prefs

2010-06-25 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
Dear folks, especially developers, I wonder if it is possible to introduce a new configuration variable (let's say $sa_user) that could hold a username. Amavisd should run spamassasin code with this uid, therefore SA could use ~username/.spamassassin/user_prefs in order to customize its rules.

Re: [AMaViS-user] @client_ipaddr_policy usage

2010-06-09 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
My test mails from MTA0 went through MTA1, MTA2, and MTA1 again and back to MTA0. MTA1 and MTA2 are configured to use service of amavisd. Amavisd received them 3 times. I expected that effective scan will be done at first time only because when MTAs receive message from each other the

Re: [AMaViS-user] @client_ipaddr_policy usage

2010-06-09 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
...Passed CLEAN [IPv6:MTA0_IPV6] [IPv6:MTA0_IPV6] My address - Mailing list address, ..., Hits: -3.107,... 3027 ms ...Passed CLEAN, NO_DSN [MTA1_IPV6] [IPv6:MTA0_IPV6] My address - Mailing list address, ..., Hits: -1.307,... 2325 ms ...Passed CLEAN, TRUSTED [IPv6:MTA2_IPv6]

[AMaViS-user] @client_ipaddr_policy usage

2010-06-08 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
Changelog writes: | What's new in amavisd-new 2.6.3: | - added a configuration variable @client_ipaddr_policy, which maps smtp | client's IP address lookup lists to a policy bank name. In this context what does client mean? So far I thought it is the MTA that passes mail to check to amavisd-new.

Re: [AMaViS-user] @client_ipaddr_policy usage

2010-06-08 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
| What's new in amavisd-new 2.6.3: | - added a configuration variable @client_ipaddr_policy, which maps smtp | client's IP address lookup lists to a policy bank name. In this context what does client mean? So far I thought it is the MTA that passes mail to check to amavisd-new. However it

Re: [AMaViS-user] Avoiding multiple scan

2010-06-04 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
Is there any way to put a (cryptographically signed) certificate into the header at the first scan like this Already checked ? This mark could be recognized in all the following rounds so amavisd could pass the message without further checks. A simple Received: by ... header is not

[AMaViS-user] Avoiding multiple scan

2010-06-03 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
I have a spam filter host (actually it is a cluster but this does not matter) that serves 2-3 MTAs simultaneously. One of them is a list server the other is my smart host as well as MX. Now if I send a message to a mailing list. The following happens: 1. My desktop machine passes the mail to the