Ralf:
2008/3/3, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I suspect that I'm running into RBL timeouts within SA.
What should I look for in the amavisd debug-sa output?
I'm seeing lots of those:
[16801] dbg: auto-whitelist: DB addr list: file locked,
Mark:
2008/2/27, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sébastien,
My gzip file has been sent personally to Mark Martinec because I had a
problem with sending it to the mailing list.
The log file I sent in my previous message was with disabling berkeleydb
and applying patch. I hope it
insert foot on mouth As usual, it was my fault, didn't think before
answer... Nevermind, it was a fricking codification issue with my
browser...
Sorry for the top-post.
2008/2/28, Luis Hernán Otegui [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark:
2008/2/27, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sébastien
Mark:
2008/2/28, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is the patch again, this time as an attachment.
Mark
As I replied to the list, it was my fault, for simply copying and
pasting from the browser. Once I downloaded the message, everything
came out nicely. My apologies, and many thanks
Hi,
2008/2/25, Temin, Aaron L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.
It appears as if the anti-virus program is always called before
SpamAssassin. Is that in fact correct? If so, is there a means to
change the order (e.g., to call SA first, then only call AV if the
message is not deemed to be
2007/12/22, gypsy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Google ignores search term , so if this has been answered I can't
find the solution.
I'm stuck with an old version of Postfix (1.1.3). I believe amavisd is
v2.4.0 dated 20060403.
I wish to have amavis discard all messages where the Postfix log says:
Hi, everybody, I was wondering if it would be possible to send a
rejection notice based on the content of the message (we're rejecting
mp3's, avi's, and every multimedia format here). Since amavis is the
one doing the trick, I figured out it should be amavis the one doing
the notify.
Could it be
Hi, Jerry
2007/11/12, Jerry Durand [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm currently running our mail server on a Mac, which greeted me this
morning with another crash. It's time to finish moving things over
to our Ubuntu box and retire the Mac.
I'm looking at the document:
Hi, people, lately I've been seeing several mails originating at my
domains (legal, solicited mails) which trigger something like this on
the logs:
do_notify_and_quarantine: rec_bl_ccat=(1,0), ccat=(1,1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to clarify, why is it triggering do_notify_and_quarantine? what
do
Hi, list, I've detected this issue in the past days.
I have a server built upon Debian Sarge, with Amavisd-new 2.5.2,
Postfix 2.1.5-9, and SA 3.2.3. Postfix has been patched so it can
serve multiple virtual domains.
Amavis is called every time a new mail arrives, and it performs AV
scanning
2007/9/28, Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 09:33 AM 9/28/2007, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Hi, list, I've detected this issue in the past days.
I have a server built upon Debian Sarge, with Amavisd-new 2.5.2,
Postfix 2.1.5-9, and SA 3.2.3. Postfix has been patched so it can
serve multiple
Hi, I have a question. I run Debian Sarge, Postfix, Amavisd-new 2.5.2,
SA 3.2.3. Every time a message is processed, Amavis logs something
like this:
Sep 27 10:04:24 nahuel amavis[1099]: (01099-01) extra modules loaded:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/BadRelay.pm, /etc/mail/spamassassin/Botnet.pm,
HI, Justin. Which setting do you have enabled on SA? (assuming you
check spam against SpamAssassin). Try disabling RBL checks, Pyzor,
Razor, DCC, etc. Maybe a stalled communication with one of those
services is sluggishing down the amavis instance...
Could you post over one of your servers the
Hi, I've been looking aroud for info about how to integrate dkimproxy
to my postfix+amavis+sa+clamav setup. So far, I've compiled dkimproxy
and made the signatures. But right now I'm about to integrate it to my
Postfix+Amavis setup, and I was wandering if the instructions shown at
the Amavis site
The trick (at least for me, and I'm running Postfix), is to tell your
SASL authenticated users to use a different port, like 465 or 587. In
fact, port 25 was nominated to be a server-to-server mail exchange
service. Clients should use Submission or smtps port. I'm re-routing
traffic from my client
2007/7/30, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jason wrote:
Running Debian 4.x.My /var/amavis/amavisd.pid file keeps
disappearing. I'm sure something in cron is doing it, but I have
not
located it yet. Does anyone know?
Do you mean /var/run/amavis/amavisd.pid?
I do, but mine is
2007/7/30, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Luis wrote:
2007/7/30, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jason wrote:
Running Debian 4.x.My /var/amavis/amavisd.pid file keeps
disappearing. I'm sure something in cron is doing it, but I have
not
located it yet. Does anyone know?
I've
This could help me with an issue which showed off when I recently
enabled SMTP AUTH over my Postfix 2.2 for my users to send mail from
outside our LAN. Everytime some user sends mail through the server, it
gets tagged with SPF_FAIL by SA. If I could remove the Received:
header which get posted
Hi, list, my Amavis-SA tamdem seems to be missing the URIDNSBL plugin from SA.
If I run a mail with a link included in the URIDNSBL blacklist through
SA (either as root or as amavis), it scopes the link and assigns it a
score of 2.0. But if I pass the mail through Postfix-Amavis-SA, the
plugin
2007/6/8, Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 19:09 -0300, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Hi, list, my Amavis-SA tamdem seems to be missing the URIDNSBL plugin
from SA.
If I run a mail with a link included in the URIDNSBL blacklist through
SA (either as root
Hi, after upgrading to Perl 5.8.8, I'm noticing this entries at the mail log:
May 15 07:01:02 dalton amavis[25900]: (25900-12) Checking:
qoykGul2eoJt MYNETS [200.26.107.200] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 15 07:01:02 dalton amavis[25900]: (25900-12) WARN: MIME::Parser
error: part did
Well, Mark, actually I don't do any quarantine, as I said before I've
set up Amavis to do tag-and-forward only (i.e., users decide what to
do with their spam). Scrubbing through the logs I've found that these
warnings come from only one sender address, a headlines reporting
service from a local
Hi, anyone has a clue on what could cause the command
# /etc/init.d/amavis reload
to fail? the line I find on syslog is
May 13 06:25:50 nahuel amavis[7609]: Net::Server: 2007/05/13-06:25:50
Server closing!
May 13 06:25:50 nahuel amavis[7609]: Net::Server: 2007/05/13-06:25:50
HUP'ing server
It
In fact, I'm logging through syslogd. so, should I remove the amavis
script at logratate?
I guess that the startup script isn't newer enough as to make amavis
reload itself in the right way. I'll get a new one and fix it to work
with Debian Sarge.
Thakns a lot,
Luis
2007/5/14, Mark Martinec
Hi, list, I've got a recurrent problem, and I think I've been able to track
it down to its cause, but I would like to have some opinions from more
experienced people.
Every sunday AMAVIS dies, and a lot of mail gets queued until I restart the
service. It appears to happen when some cron jobs run.
,
Luix
2007/4/23, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Luis Hernán Otegui,
Hi, list, I've got a recurrent problem, and I think I've been able to
track
it down to its cause, but I would like to have some opinions from more
experienced people.
Every sunday AMAVIS dies, and a lot of mail gets
Hi, list, I have this problem:
I've set up a global whitelist to bypass spam checks, this way:
read_hash(\%whitelist_sender, '/var/lib/amavis/whitelist');
where /var/lib/amavis/whitelist is a regular text file, with one email
address per line. However, this doesn't always work, since I see some
Hi, everybody, this is my first mail to the list. I' ve been running AMaViS,
SA and Postfix for a while with local quarantine for spams. Periodically, I
logged on to the server, checked the quarantine account, and silently
forwarded false positives to my users (after teaching them to SA).
Righ
Well, thanks a lot, I got puzzled with sa_tag, sa_tag2 and sa_kill_level,
but I figured it out about an hour ago. My mistake, I had sa_tag2 and
sa_kill_level at the same value.
Right now my servers are rjecting everything above 10, as I wanted, and
tagging and forwarding everything between 5 and
29 matches
Mail list logo
