Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-03-11 Thread Need Coffee
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote: Need Coffee, For the archives because I think it is solved: Even with amavisd you apparently have to configure trusted_networks for SA. Indeed. I now have in local.cf the following which matches

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-03-10 Thread Need Coffee
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Need Coffee need.cof...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote: It claims to have found an entry for u...@example.com w/o IP address (ip=none, I assume) Yes, that would normally be an:  

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-03-10 Thread Mark Martinec
Need Coffee, For the archives because I think it is solved: Even with amavisd you apparently have to configure trusted_networks for SA. Indeed. I now have in local.cf the following which matches amavisd.conf's @mynetworks: clear_internal_networks internal_networks 127/8

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-26 Thread Need Coffee
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote: There were a few threads on the SA mailinglist about it, but I have been unable to find anything useful... and all the SA chatter was complaining about not setting up trust correctly which in my case is dependent

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-26 Thread Mark Martinec
It claims to have found an entry for u...@example.com w/o IP address (ip=none, I assume) Yes, that would normally be an: u...@example.com|ip=none At that point the AutoWhitelist.pm should also be removing such database entry and replacing it with a new one containing the ip part. even though

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-26 Thread Need Coffee
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote: It claims to have found an entry for u...@example.com w/o IP address (ip=none, I assume) Yes, that would normally be an: u...@example.com|ip=none At that point the AutoWhitelist.pm should also be removing

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-23 Thread Mark Martinec
There were a few threads on the SA mailinglist about it, but I have been unable to find anything useful... and all the SA chatter was complaining about not setting up trust correctly which in my case is dependent on amavisd and is correct. Like a lot of places we are getting spam like this:

[AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-22 Thread Need Coffee
Hi. There were a few threads on the SA mailinglist about it, but I have been unable to find anything useful... and all the SA chatter was complaining about not setting up trust correctly which in my case is dependent on amavisd and is correct. Like a lot of places we are getting spam like this:

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-22 Thread Jo Rhett
Are you using sendmail with amavisd-milter? If so there were some bugs which caused the network path to be broken that have been fixed in the last year. Things appeared to work, but in reality they didn't :-( On Jan 22, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Need Coffee wrote: There were a few threads on the

Re: [AMaViS-user] AWL, ALL_TRUSTED, From: = To: spam

2009-01-22 Thread Need Coffee
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote: Are you using sendmail with amavisd-milter? If so there were some bugs which caused the network path to be broken that have been fixed in the last year. Things appeared to work, but in reality they didn't :-(